Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Title: MatchMaker 224
Host: Nobody
Game version: Zero-K v1.5.4.9
Engine version: 103.0.1-747-g2ef5870
Started: 6 years ago
Duration: 14 minutes
Players: 2
Bots: False
Mission: False
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 1
Chance of victory: 36.5%

USrankFealthas
Team 2
Chance of victory: 63.5%

GBrankLlamadeus
Spectators
DErankkatastrophe
HUrankCicero

Show winners



Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort

6 years ago
Rouges are still realllllllly terrible. Notice how they managed to kill literally nothing for the first few minutes. Damage was never their problem...its that they can't hit anything.

+1 / -0

6 years ago
I've had a very different experience. They've been crapping all over my rocko/warrior, and assaulting straight through my porc lines.

They have really good health, range, and now damage. Maybe they don't fill the roll of traditional skirm, but I'm pretty sure they're not bad? Their damage is crazy.
+0 / -0

6 years ago
Mind providing replays?
I just don't really see how I misused rouges. I think I used them pretty well, up until I gave up and tried to commsnipe. In that period they did not achieve much. llama was good about not standing still/walking in long straight lines and they were so useless. He just pushed up a hill with warriors vs rouges...
+0 / -0

6 years ago
http://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/453993

I believe it was this one. Note I haven't watched your replay or mine, I'm just talking the impression I got.
+0 / -0

6 years ago
That is a battle in which I used rogues, yes. (I did have favourable terrain to employ them on.)
+0 / -0

6 years ago
http://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/454468

This one really shows their power. On flats vs. Lad's hover.
+0 / -0