Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Team Room

11 posts, 249 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
sort


ITrankmanero
12 days ago
Even tonight, as every evening, in zero k, despite the launch on the steam platform, you play in one room, "pot lob" or similar names. We often have to wait from 10 minutes to even 1 hour to connect and play. Not to mention the lag you suffer especially in games with 16 players against 16.It is not possible to create more rooms with a maximum number of 8 players, without leaving the host the choice of the number of players?
+3 / -0



CHrankAdminDeinFreund
12 days ago
Yes, that's possible.

Yes, we've tried it.

No, it doesn't work out.
+4 / -0


ITrankmanero
12 days ago
then trololo forever? sigh
+0 / -0


ITrankmanero
12 days ago
why not do planetwars and insert a team command center that once lost the game, a bit like the king in chess? It would be fun!
+0 / -0

DErankBrackman
11 days ago
Sometimes the people waiting for the big room to finish are already enough to start a new game. I don't know if they really want to wait or they only fear that nobody will join a potential new room.

I think some force should be applied to split rooms better. Does the !split command even still exist? I think a votesplit could be casted automatically if there are more than 12 players in a room, but only if parallelized votes are made possible so that other votes can happen at the same time. Some vote commands could be parallelized to reduce voting delays.

And I think it should be possible to enter a minimum team size for which you are available in the teams matchmaker because currently, it's only a 2v2 matchmaker.
+0 / -0


DErankAdminmojjj
11 days ago
quote:
I think some force should be applied to split rooms better.


no.
+1 / -0




EErankAdminAnarchid
11 days ago
(edited 11 days ago)

If you are a type of person who wants to play 8v8, you are the type of person who ends up feeding 16v16.

Sad but true.
+1 / -0



CHrankAdminDeinFreund
11 days ago
Next patch will have the option to have autohosts again. I'll try to create some Newbie and Experienced hosts using Elo limits. If people choose to play on those, it'll decrease the size of the other games.
+5 / -0


DErankkatastrophe
11 days ago
did you remember to feed me?
+1 / -0



RUrankFirepluk
11 days ago
(edited 11 days ago)

quote:
Next patch will have the option to have autohosts again. I'll try to create some Newbie and Experienced hosts using Elo limits. If people choose to play on those, it'll decrease the size of the other games.

If you going to do this, do as needed not just for a tick you've done it...
Under-elo players should be spectated automatically and should be allowed only to spectate

Previous implementation just didn't allow to start games and people had to spec shrimps manually, they would unspec... Was a total nightmare
+2 / -0



CHrankAdminDeinFreund
11 days ago
It's implemented such that you simply can't unspec if your elo/level doesnt match the requirements.
+4 / -0