| 1 |
[quote]I was just trying to prove a point where you can run 1000 units without lag[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]I was just trying to prove a point where you can run 1000 units without lag[/quote]
|
| 2 |
- The video was still stuttery.
|
2 |
- The video was still stuttery.
|
| 3 |
- He never had more than 100-200 units actually [i]doing[/i] something at the same time. You could clearly see that everyone behind the frontline did nothing, and many units in combat actually idled, too.
|
3 |
- He never had more than 100-200 units actually [i]doing[/i] something at the same time. You could clearly see that everyone behind the frontline did nothing, and many units in combat actually idled, too.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
I'm sure ZK would have no problem running smoothly (which apprently means 10 fps) with 1000 units if you're fine with 80% of them not reacting to commands. Note how this further the point @GoogleFrog makes.
|
5 |
I'm sure ZK would have no problem running smoothly (which apprently means 10 fps) with 1000 units if you're fine with 80% of them not reacting to commands. Note how this further the point @GoogleFrog makes.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
And no, 250 archers standing and turning is not "a lot going on", either.
|
7 |
And no, 250 archers standing and turning is not "a lot going on", either.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
|
|
| 9 |
[quote]zero-k with 300 units gets unplayable even if you have strong pc[/quote]
|
|
|
| 10 |
I'm not sure what you mean by unplayable, but regardless, do you have a source for this?
|
|
|
B442244 11 on Stronghold_beta (Multiplayer)