Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

B555536 2 on Barren 2 (Multiplayer)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
6/8/2018 6:52:49 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
6/8/2018 6:50:01 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
Before After
1 [q]PLrankOrfelius I want artillery that is good at being artillery. Currently the only good "artillery" is better against units than buildings, things like killager, firewalker, lance, wolverine(before nerfing). Things like hammer and impaler are just bad. Youre much better off just spamming more rockos or ravager/slasher to kill porc.[/q] 1 [q]PLrankOrfelius I want artillery that is good at being artillery. Currently the only good "artillery" is better against units than buildings, things like killager, firewalker, lance, wolverine(before nerfing). Things like hammer and impaler are just bad. Youre much better off just spamming more rockos or ravager/slasher to kill porc.[/q]
2 \n 2 \n
3 I don't understand what is that supposed to mean. Artilery is meant to stay in the back and shoot enemies at a large range. Well that is exactly what Emissary/Pillager does (and so does Lance). 3 I don't understand what is that supposed to mean. Artilery is meant to stay in the back and shoot enemies at a large range. Well that is exactly what Emissary/Pillager does (and so does Lance).
4 \n
5 Mind you I'm not saying that Emissary is strictly "fun" its just what I think of when I think of "good artilery" and that makes me think that your wish of having "good artilery" in the game would make things even more of a WW 1 simulator.