| 1 |
[quote]There is clear evidence if you watch the replay that USrankDrascalicus died from my tactical nukes and then he had the connection problems.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]There is clear evidence if you watch the replay that USrankDrascalicus died from my tactical nukes and then he had the connection problems.[/quote]
|
| 2 |
This simply isn't true. At 42:30 or so when the DRP was tacnuked, Drascalicus had 999s+ ping indicating that he was catching up. He hadn't even got to the point yet where he could *tell* you and it's not obvious to notice the problem with current playerlists so I perhaps should not have gotten so annoyed about the action itself. Your attitude about it afterwards (no apology and gloating about the outcome of the game in general) still ticks me off though.
|
2 |
This simply isn't true. At 42:30 or so when the DRP was tacnuked, Drascalicus had 999s+ ping indicating that he was catching up. He hadn't even got to the point yet where he could *tell* you and it's not obvious to notice the problem with current playerlists so I perhaps should not have gotten so annoyed about the action itself. Your attitude about it afterwards (no apology and gloating about the outcome of the game in general) still ticks me off though.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote]It's weird that nobody reacted to counter him since he was the strongest after me...
|
4 |
[quote]It's weird that nobody reacted to counter him since he was the strongest after me...
|
| 5 |
[/quote]
|
5 |
[/quote]
|
| 6 |
This also isn't true. Drascalicus nuked him twice, just like you got nuked. Mc_Giggle also pressured 4hundred a fair bit.
|
6 |
This also isn't true. Drascalicus nuked him twice, just like you got nuked. Mc_Giggle also pressured 4hundred a fair bit.
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
[quote]What seems to be your problem?[/quote]
|
8 |
[quote]What seems to be your problem?[/quote]
|
| 9 |
I found your gloating about winning a game given the advantage of a disconnected neighbour, and what I saw as attempts to spin the moral of the game into "dont ever attack me" so that you can win FFA games more easily in the future, distasteful. I don't have a *general* problem but I got steamed up in the context of this particular game. Sorry.
|
9 |
I found your gloating about winning a game given the advantage of a disconnected neighbour, and what I saw as attempts to spin the moral of the game into "dont ever attack me" so that you can win FFA games more easily in the future, distasteful. I don't have a *general* problem but I got steamed up in the context of this particular game. Sorry.
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
[spoiler]I also think you did way less to kill 4hundred than Drascalicus and Mc_Giggle. Not that in my view whether you did or not affects how much you deserved to win. Deserving to win in a FFA is "being the strongest of the last two players standing". There are several valid ways to get there.
|
11 |
[spoiler]I also think you did way less to kill 4hundred than Drascalicus and Mc_Giggle. Not that in my view whether you did or not affects how much you deserved to win. Deserving to win in a FFA is "being the strongest of the last two players standing". There are several valid ways to get there.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
I'm
not
saying
you
didn't
*deserve*
to
win,
certainly
you
defeated
edrush
fair
and
square
at
the
end,
just
that
I
think
it
is
not
polite
to
gloat
so
much
about
it
given
the
advantage
you
were
handed.
[/spoiler]
|
13 |
I'm
not
saying
you
didn't
*deserve*
to
win,
certainly
you
defeated
edrush
fair
and
square
at
the
end
from
a
position
that
was
not
obviously
stronger,
just
that
I
think
it
is
not
polite
to
gloat
so
much
about
it
given
the
advantage
you
were
handed.
[/spoiler]
|
| 14 |
\n
|
14 |
\n
|
| 15 |
[quote]Hang on. This is an FFA. I thought misinformation and half truths were all part of the game. That's usually what makes it interesting. If you can manipulate other people into wrong choices, fair play to you.[/quote]
|
15 |
[quote]Hang on. This is an FFA. I thought misinformation and half truths were all part of the game. That's usually what makes it interesting. If you can manipulate other people into wrong choices, fair play to you.[/quote]
|
| 16 |
That's quite true. I'm trying to educate people that believing what other people say in a FFA, particularly people who have a history of misinforming for their own benefit in FFA games, is not a good idea. This will hopefully raise the level of FFA play in general, and result in more interesting games for me to play and watch rather than watch the same "only one player knows to scout for themselves, so they will almost always win" game over and over.
|
16 |
That's quite true. I'm trying to educate people that believing what other people say in a FFA, particularly people who have a history of misinforming for their own benefit in FFA games, is not a good idea. This will hopefully raise the level of FFA play in general, and result in more interesting games for me to play and watch rather than watch the same "only one player knows to scout for themselves, so they will almost always win" game over and over.
|
B757323 5 on Azure Rampart (Multiplayer)