Loading...

Forum index > General discussion >

Awards hall of fame abuse?

4 posts, 260 views

Post comment

Filter: Player:

sort
Kapy 3 years ago A minor, really unimportant thing, but... Shouldnt it be somehow limited as to what battles get your name into that list? It seems you can get top score rating on many awards just by playing a custom battle where you get +400 income from the start. (And being a noob who has no idea how to really play? Still get top score on many awards with amounts that would normally be almost impossible to achieve) http://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/883895 a person with 10 battles of experience got 3 top scores with huge values from one custom noobz battle. Easy abuz for maximum respek. +0 / -0
malric 3 years ago Might be interesting to adjust, but should be well thought. Awards like you describe can appear also with a casual team game where everybody has low rank. Maybe show best awards per rank tier and game type? Like matchmaking 1v1, purple rank awards, etc. But then you have too many. Or split the ladders to 2 pages (one for MM and one for casual), and then for each award put top collector per tier. +0 / -0
Sprung 3 years ago The page only really exists for random noobs to get gratification for grindfests. Everybody else knows the values are meaningless. +1 / -0
1RAVEn 3 years ago i tought its purpose is to let you know you been playing to much, which you can tell when there is your name as top collector for each category +2 / -0