Difference between revisions of "Talk:Building Usage"

From Zero-K
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== Why this page? == Wouldn't it make sense to put this in the '''Tactics and Strategy''' section of each building? There's also Buildings ~~~~")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Why this page? ==
 
== Why this page? ==
 
Wouldn't it make sense to put this in the '''Tactics and Strategy''' section of each building? There's also [[Buildings]] [[Special:Contributions/84.254.91.146|84.254.91.146]] 00:24, 22 August 2018 (CEST)
 
Wouldn't it make sense to put this in the '''Tactics and Strategy''' section of each building? There's also [[Buildings]] [[Special:Contributions/84.254.91.146|84.254.91.146]] 00:24, 22 August 2018 (CEST)
 +
 +
 +
 +
Most info pages tend to be very generic and I wanted to give some more specific info. I thought having a generic building page and a specific building page would be good.
 +
I personally think that having all building strategy in one page is better than having it be dispersed among each unit entry, but I dont see why it couldn't be in both locations too. This page isn't linked to from anywhere yet as I had trouble thinking about where it fit in, like you.--[[User:Fealthas|Fealthas]] ([[User talk:Fealthas|talk]]) 22:26, 23 August 2018 (CEST)

Revision as of 12:26, 23 August 2018

Why this page?

Wouldn't it make sense to put this in the Tactics and Strategy section of each building? There's also Buildings 84.254.91.146 00:24, 22 August 2018 (CEST)


Most info pages tend to be very generic and I wanted to give some more specific info. I thought having a generic building page and a specific building page would be good. I personally think that having all building strategy in one page is better than having it be dispersed among each unit entry, but I dont see why it couldn't be in both locations too. This page isn't linked to from anywhere yet as I had trouble thinking about where it fit in, like you.--Fealthas (talk) 22:26, 23 August 2018 (CEST)