Difference between revisions of "Talk:Newbie Guide"

From Zero-K
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
The information in the Unit Guide is very outdated. It needs to be designated as such or removed. Better yet the guide, it could be updated, but how?
 
The information in the Unit Guide is very outdated. It needs to be designated as such or removed. Better yet the guide, it could be updated, but how?
 +
 +
- There is tons of stuff "wrong" with the current version and my revision actually did little to change things (not even touching on things hanging on this thread). The best thing that could happens to this is just a complete rework. Hit me up in ''(ohjustforgetit)'', maybe we'll figure stuff out (we're not in 2010 to comunicate through chat-pages lmao). --[[User:UlTima RaTio|UlTima RaTio]] ([[User talk:UlTima RaTio|talk]]) 11:58, 29 April 2020 (CEST)
 +
 +
::Well, this is a general discussion for anyone to chime in, not aimed at you personally, so no reason to take it elsewhere. And it is only about the last sentence that has a link to the Unit Guide. Maybe an admin can update it or give someone who can update it the rights to edit it.
 +
::—[[User:RandomX|RandomX]] ([[User talk:RandomX|talk]]) 03:48, 30 April 2020 (CEST)
 +
:::Made it point to the [[Units]] page instead of that old page (which is no longer maintained and should not be used). — [[User:Histidine|Histidine]] ([[User talk:Histidine|talk]]) 04:30, 30 April 2020 (CEST)
 +
:::: offtopic: The damn general discussion here is going to bring nothing, since wiki as a whole supported by a handful of ppl. Who are you going to discuss stuff here with, three other people looking at wiki periodically (even after the fireworks at forum) with a cuts in dialogue taking days? How is that faster then straight-up contacting administration? If the only thing you see wrong with this guide is the link at the end then yeah, probably the same amount of sense sitting here, poking each problem 48 hours. Who needs consolidated work anyway. --[[User:UlTima RaTio|UlTima RaTio]] ([[User talk:UlTima RaTio|talk]]) 07:46, 30 April 2020 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 22:46, 29 April 2020

I really like these gifs. Can someone make more of these? --Shaman (talk) 11:33, 29 July 2018 (CEST)

Outdated Unit Guide problem[edit]

The information in the Unit Guide is very outdated. It needs to be designated as such or removed. Better yet the guide, it could be updated, but how?

- There is tons of stuff "wrong" with the current version and my revision actually did little to change things (not even touching on things hanging on this thread). The best thing that could happens to this is just a complete rework. Hit me up in (ohjustforgetit), maybe we'll figure stuff out (we're not in 2010 to comunicate through chat-pages lmao). --UlTima RaTio (talk) 11:58, 29 April 2020 (CEST)

Well, this is a general discussion for anyone to chime in, not aimed at you personally, so no reason to take it elsewhere. And it is only about the last sentence that has a link to the Unit Guide. Maybe an admin can update it or give someone who can update it the rights to edit it.
RandomX (talk) 03:48, 30 April 2020 (CEST)
Made it point to the Units page instead of that old page (which is no longer maintained and should not be used). — Histidine (talk) 04:30, 30 April 2020 (CEST)
offtopic: The damn general discussion here is going to bring nothing, since wiki as a whole supported by a handful of ppl. Who are you going to discuss stuff here with, three other people looking at wiki periodically (even after the fireworks at forum) with a cuts in dialogue taking days? How is that faster then straight-up contacting administration? If the only thing you see wrong with this guide is the link at the end then yeah, probably the same amount of sense sitting here, poking each problem 48 hours. Who needs consolidated work anyway. --UlTima RaTio (talk) 07:46, 30 April 2020 (CEST)