Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Navbox changelog"

From Zero-K
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "TO DO: * Add dates of release to each page. * Make navbox in chronological order. This out of order navbox is annoying me. * Possibly make a changelog page OR a little inf...")
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
--[[User:Shaman|Shaman]] ([[User talk:Shaman|talk]]) 13:12, 8 January 2019 (CET)
 
--[[User:Shaman|Shaman]] ([[User talk:Shaman|talk]]) 13:12, 8 January 2019 (CET)
 +
 +
== Section numbering ==
 +
 +
Would there be any negative side effects from making 2013 the first section and just adding a new one every year (as opposed to renumbering all of them every year)? —[[User:RandomX|RandomX]] ([[User talk:RandomX|talk]]) 20:46, 9 July 2022 (PDT)
 +
 +
:I don't think so. Might be a good idea to ask one of the admins/mods first if that is what would be preferred. --[[User:Mach56|Mach56]] ([[User talk:Mach56|talk]]) 01:17, 20 July 2022 (PDT)
 +
 +
== Bundling patches together ==
 +
 +
Should we just bundle all the .Y.XX versions together onto a single page? Some earlier ones seem to be single line changes, no reason for each of those to have its own page. The more filled out ones will create a large page, but I think that's a fair price to pay to not have 20 pages for all the 1.6.1.XX versions.

Latest revision as of 00:37, 20 July 2022

TO DO:

  • Add dates of release to each page.
  • Make navbox in chronological order. This out of order navbox is annoying me.
  • Possibly make a changelog page OR a little infobox on the side of the page that gives a quick summery/goal of major changes in each patch. ("This patch tried to balance hovers", "Bug fix patch", etc)
  • ENSURE ALL PAGES ACTUALLY CONTAIN THE NAVBOX (I've caught a few of them that lacked it)
  • Update patch notes to new editing style (See v1.2.12.0 for example)
    • Forum post tags are ugly.

--Shaman (talk) 13:12, 8 January 2019 (CET)

Section numbering

Would there be any negative side effects from making 2013 the first section and just adding a new one every year (as opposed to renumbering all of them every year)? —RandomX (talk) 20:46, 9 July 2022 (PDT)

I don't think so. Might be a good idea to ask one of the admins/mods first if that is what would be preferred. --Mach56 (talk) 01:17, 20 July 2022 (PDT)

Bundling patches together

Should we just bundle all the .Y.XX versions together onto a single page? Some earlier ones seem to be single line changes, no reason for each of those to have its own page. The more filled out ones will create a large page, but I think that's a fair price to pay to not have 20 pages for all the 1.6.1.XX versions.