Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Navbox changelog"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Section numbering: new section) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Section numbering == | == Section numbering == | ||
| − | Would there be any negative side effects from making 2013 the first section and just adding a new one every year (as opposed to renumbering all of them every year)? | + | Would there be any negative side effects from making 2013 the first section and just adding a new one every year (as opposed to renumbering all of them every year)? —[[User:RandomX|RandomX]] ([[User talk:RandomX|talk]]) 20:46, 9 July 2022 (PDT) |
| + | |||
| + | :I don't think so. Might be a good idea to ask one of the admins/mods first if that is what would be preferred. --[[User:Mach56|Mach56]] ([[User talk:Mach56|talk]]) 01:17, 20 July 2022 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Bundling patches together == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should we just bundle all the .Y.XX versions together onto a single page? Some earlier ones seem to be single line changes, no reason for each of those to have its own page. The more filled out ones will create a large page, but I think that's a fair price to pay to not have 20 pages for all the 1.6.1.XX versions. | ||
Latest revision as of 00:37, 20 July 2022
TO DO:
- Add dates of release to each page.
- Make navbox in chronological order. This out of order navbox is annoying me.
- Possibly make a changelog page OR a little infobox on the side of the page that gives a quick summery/goal of major changes in each patch. ("This patch tried to balance hovers", "Bug fix patch", etc)
- ENSURE ALL PAGES ACTUALLY CONTAIN THE NAVBOX (I've caught a few of them that lacked it)
- Update patch notes to new editing style (See v1.2.12.0 for example)
- Forum post tags are ugly.
--Shaman (talk) 13:12, 8 January 2019 (CET)
Section numbering
Would there be any negative side effects from making 2013 the first section and just adding a new one every year (as opposed to renumbering all of them every year)? —RandomX (talk) 20:46, 9 July 2022 (PDT)
- I don't think so. Might be a good idea to ask one of the admins/mods first if that is what would be preferred. --Mach56 (talk) 01:17, 20 July 2022 (PDT)
Bundling patches together
Should we just bundle all the .Y.XX versions together onto a single page? Some earlier ones seem to be single line changes, no reason for each of those to have its own page. The more filled out ones will create a large page, but I think that's a fair price to pay to not have 20 pages for all the 1.6.1.XX versions.
