Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Title: BIG TEAMS: Newbies welcome!
Host: CZrankHydrogen
Game version: Zero-K v1.0.4.17
Engine version: 88.0
Battle ID: 71228
Started: 12 years ago
Duration: 40 minutes
Players: 8
Bots: False
Mission: False
Rating: Casual
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 1 Won!
Chance of victory: 31.8%
XP gained: 105
ESrankFalelovsky
USrankjseah
GBrankFireEagle
BRrankartcro
Team 2 Lost
Chance of victory: 68.2%
XP gained: 87
USrankTrystero died in 40 minutes
CRrank[ACE]Warslay died in 40 minutes
BRrankVallety died in 40 minutes
FIrankBladeArtist died in 40 minutes
Spectators
CZrankAdminLicho
BRrank[V]sheep




Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
12 years ago
Alright, I admit that I was mistaken and east did launch coordinated attacks. Yes, you are right.

I think this is a case of overestimating your enemies though. Yes, west had the strength to win before we did. But facing two dantes, a cloud of vamps and what looks like shielded porc in the radar, I was afraid to commit to an attack that might fail and reverse the advantage.

Especially when I could not count on my allies to back up any push from me.

So I sat on the supermexes and wreckage field until my ally forced my hand and revealed the enemy's weakness.
I knew we would win if we could hold center; and if I judged attacking to be risky, I maintain that not attacking was the right decision.

Perhaps I could have scouted. Perhaps I delayed attacking too long. Maybe I should have built a warlord. Yes, those were options that I could have taken and did not. Suffice it to say that I am not a perfect player and I often forget options available to me.


BladeArtist:
To you, it looked like we were prolonging the game. For that I'm sorry and I apologize. Please understand that, to me, when I was on the spot, it did not seem that way.

I'm not sorry enough to be reckless though. =)
+0 / -0