Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

About aircons

27 posts, 887 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
Page of 2 (27 records)
sort
Are GS cons and planes cons going ot be separated, or they are going to be left as they are now?

Pesonally I'd see GS con as slower and heaveir aircon, for slower, but more stable expansion, maybe armed with single pew-pew gun, while planes con as faster and lighter con, for more rapid epansion, ofc.

Basically plane con being to Gs con what LV con is to HV con.
+5 / -0


8 years ago
Bring forth the Sky Welder with the Leveler Sidearm.

As in, i would love to have separate gunship and plane constructors, but pls, no armed tanky allterrain builders.
+1 / -0
as in little krow minus d-gun ? oh wait. dont minus the dgun! we need dgun!

new neonstorming: constructor dgun, adds temporarily more buildpower for more plop!
+2 / -0
8 years ago
A mini krow with neonstorm dgun!!!
+1 / -0
8 years ago
Oh shush, mini Krow with BP would be awesome.
+0 / -0


8 years ago
I would have seperate builders but there is no model for it. At least no good model.
+0 / -0
Skasi
8 years ago
quote:
but there is no model for it. At least no good model.


Then why was the old Rapier replaced? QQ
+2 / -0

8 years ago
I liked the old twin-rotor copter aircon model.
+0 / -0
Ye, maybe try using old Rapier model as planes con? For time being.
TBH current aircon model is ugly as hell too..
+0 / -0

8 years ago
Old rapier model is nice, but it's a *plane*. Using it for a vtol has never looked good.
+1 / -0
So don't Raven, Wyvern, Vamp and other planes while landing on rep pad.
+1 / -0
8 years ago
I was thinking the same, these 2 cons should be splitted into 2 different units.
+0 / -0

8 years ago
Having an air con that's not vtol doesn't make any sense.

Neither does having a unit unique to planes that's vtol.

-1
+0 / -1
Concepts for a fixed-wing constructor were proposed previously, including one that dropped a single-use nanoturret, which would only perform only the assigned build-task and then suicide. The plane itself would reload and operate like a bomber, and be limited to only using one 'bomb' at a time.
+2 / -0
does it have to be special and gadgety? i like the idea of doing something similar to lveh/hveh cons - in this case planes con would be fast and cheap, but with bad buildpower and health. gs would be the opposite. maybe gs con could have a tiny bit of aa so it doesnt instantly succumb to the first swift scout.
+1 / -0

8 years ago
quote:
Neither does having a unit unique to planes that's vtol.

Why? Facs are generally grouped by movetype but exceptions already exist.
[Spoiler]
+0 / -0
8 years ago
quote:
Tick is a spider.

WHAT??? Lel I'm lv 103 and I don't know movetypes of units
+5 / -0

8 years ago
+0 / -0
Oh, the sollution to vtol is simple. What do planes do when idling? They fly in circles. Make air con do small low altitude circles around its building target then. Problem solved.

This way it will piss the hell off Rockos and other skirmishers, BTW ^^
+0 / -0

8 years ago
Engine doesnt support fixed-wing aircons, they have to be gunships.
Differentiating with speed, weight and health sounds enough for starters though.
+0 / -0
Page of 2 (27 records)