improve climax at end of games

every time i play and every time i lose or win i feel like no climax, the game just shuts down.



how about give the losing team each one banthas/detriment/krow/NOCOST for one minunte?

That way I WOULD LOVE TO LOSING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Call me old-fashioned, but I just think that encouraging players to lose is a bad idea.

Before ppl start to demand higher OD at high energies, I'd like to say that singu and fusion cost reduction is the better option as I already said when high OD was nerfed, because increasing the OD coefficient would also buff low energy OD even more. Using hokomoko 's OD principle would be even better, though.

[Spoiler]

You want a climax? Get a girlfriend...

give losing team each a banthas for one minute.............. that way everyone can win.

I think that's a bad idea, Bantha has 36000 Hp and lots of damage from it Tachyon accellerator.
Hard to kill, and seems like a perfect way to really screw games over, as it gives an incentive to lose, not to win.

Actually, from time to time there is a battle after which i have to check the battle page, cuz ive got no idea who won.
Matbe pospone the battle for 15-20 seconds after resignig instead of throwing summary window at my face instantly, and mąkę the lost units do something fancy instead of just exploding?
Losers commanders and/or some units could e.g. retreat to mothership, just like latecommers coms drop, but the other way.

I will not mąkę the lost units thank you very much Failer. That is a desacration of bodies and is punishable by law.

quote: I will not mąkę the lost units thank you very much Failer

Oh, lol, i didnt even notice. Dam you, polish Google spellchecker.

Batman I don't think you are being trolled (or at least, as much as you think). I think this thread is closely related to people's reaction to a losing player resigning when they have clearly lost. Some people get annoyed by their opponent resigning because it denies them the reward of assaulting and blowing up their final base. Other people are annoyed by their opponent non resigning because they do not want to play games where the winner has already been decided.

Many competitive games have adopted a resign culture instead of a culture of letting the winner destroy your base. Perhaps playing a game for a while makes you lose interest in blowing up bases just for the sake of it. Also, competitive games may just attract people who would much rather play the part of the game where the outcome is uncertain than the victory march at the end.

I think I can understand wanting to go on a victory march. The extra confusing thing here is that you are suggesting a defeat march. Doesn't that mess up the incentive to win?

If we're trying to maximize marching and blowing stuff up how about the following proposal? After a game has run for 30 minutes we would desync the game. The desync takes the form of every player receiving a Bantha while their opponents appear to recieve no Banthas. Now all players can go on a victory march through their opponents base. Perhaps this could be initialized by resigning but why should that be the case? Batman I'd like to know if there is actually anything wrong with this idea.