Is the rating variance (at https://zero-k.info/Charts/Ratings?RatingCategory=1&UserId=5295
the number that has +/- for the current rating) guaranteed to converge with increasing number of games played in a period? (and if yes, by how much)
I am playing rather rarely (once in 2 weeks for example) and I now have the impression that the variance remains high. This might be due to the fact that as I play in large team games (don't judge :-p) and the system is "undecided" forever if I actually play good or bad.
While I understand the objective of penalizing players that play rarely, and players that play randomly (which might look like for my case), I still think it would be nice/fair/desirable to have some ladder rating. If now I look at my "Ladder rating" it would be 2163 which would put me quite high. Of course, if there are 50 others players in my situation, then maybe I am much lower.
Would welcome any fix for this (for example an edit/dropdown to choose the variance at: https://zero-k.info/Ladders/Full)