Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Back to List

Rapids_v1 Featured

By Beherith
Rating:

Rapids_v1 - for 1v1 all arms. All units pass shallows. Made by [teh]Beherith (mysterme[at]gmail.com)
Size: 8 x 8

PLAY ON THIS MAP


Downloads: 27927
Manual downloads:
https://springfiles.springrts.com/files/maps/rapids_v1.sd7
http://zero-k.info/content/maps/Rapids_v1.sd7
http://zero-k.info/content/maps/rapids_v1.sd7

Last battles

Multiplayer B2498632 2 on Rapids_v1
Bots B2496774 0 on Rapids_v1
Multiplayer B2496723 6 on Rapids_v1
Multiplayer B2493521 2 on Rapids_v1
Bots B2492611 2 on Rapids_v1
Multiplayer B2491994 2 on Rapids_v1
Bots B2491572 1 on Rapids_v1
Multiplayer B2490484 4 on Rapids_v1
Bots B2489974 1 on Rapids_v1
Bots B2489967 1 on Rapids_v1


Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
UArankBoBaH
13 years ago
Very nice map. Good work!
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
13 years ago
The image for this map fails to load in a ZKL battleroom.
+0 / -0
Skasi
11 years ago
Symmetry needs to be fixed. Southeast mex is not standardized and someone said hovers can climb one of the (hill) bases but not the other.
+0 / -0

CArankPxtl
11 years ago
For bugs like that, should the approach be "unfeature first and ask questions later"?
+0 / -1
Skasi
11 years ago
Maybe first ask if people still looove the map for all its other features. Personally I don't, but others might
+2 / -0
USrankJasper
11 years ago
Hovers have a hard time getting on to the hills because its a narrow path. I will check I know they can get onto bottom hill.
+0 / -0
USrankJasper
11 years ago
Tested hover can get on and off both hill however on both hills they require micro and they get stuck.
+2 / -0

USrankStuart98
11 years ago
This map is bad and whoever featured it should feel bad. Unfeature please.
+3 / -0
Skasi
11 years ago
All it needs is smoother ramps for better and more symmetric hover pathing, nu?
+0 / -0
PLrankOrfelius
11 years ago
If it is broken/uninteresting in current state then unfeature. Personally I think it is.
Saying "it could be easily fixed" is not an argument for keeping it in the current mappool. If it is going to be fixed then it might be reintroduced.
Simple as that.
+1 / -0
Back to List