Suggestion: Minimum Team Sizes For TAW

I know I'm not the only one who sits in the Spectator room of TAW waiting for the lobby to get going because I don't want to afk in the lobby itself waiting for a game just to get trolled into a surprise 1v1 against e.g. stuart when I'm editing my youtube playlist.

Just recently we had something like 15 people in speclobby and an open discussion about how everyone wanted in, but no one wanted to risk sitting and get drawn into a bad game.

Ergo, for one of the TAWs, I suggest not allowing the game to begin until it's at least a 4v4, so those of us who want to play a decently sized game can help seed lobbies.

I would prefer not allowing starting until 3v3 by displaying a message "this hosts needs at least 6 players to start a game" - I find it more simple and clear for players that have no idea what to expect.

Or, alternatively change the voting threshold to 100% of players below some game size (and display the threshold!) so that nobody can drag you into a game that you don't want to play.

ELO/WHR is fun to have, but I find it an approximation (due to new players, play style variability and other reasons).

Ideally everybody should have a slider what "chance" is willing to take to join a game, I would personally probably accept 35% chance of winning to play in a "smallish" game (between 6 and 12 players).

For larger game I would like to have a maximum variation to join a game, sometimes balancer puts best one + all the worse ones in a team and all the other in the other team (or milder variations of this pattern), which I find quite bad balance.