Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Plane Con Model Suggestion

16 posts, 2014 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
sort
USrankZag
11 years ago
I made a model as a suggestion for the Plane Con. The hexagons cut out of the wings are holes that are meant to have propellers for a VTOL look.

I did post this in this thread: http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/4416 but the discussion there was focused on the abilities of the con, so I posted my model suggestion here.

Top:

Bottom:

Back:


Any comments or suggestions?
+0 / -0

11 years ago
Add a bomb bay if it's the bomb con, or a visible nanospray emitter if it's a traditional con. Would a cheap light con have 4 propellers or just one? I like the model in V2000:
You get the idea...
+0 / -0
This is just the base model; I have no idea how the plane con will build, but it is easy enough to add a nano-sprayer or bomb-bay to the model. As for the propellers, I wanted to have a distinct plane look, and it doesn't look like it would hover with just 2 propellers.
+0 / -0
Ideally planes should have collapsing wings and rotating engines. The Vamp is an ideal model here. Many of the models don't have this, I know (Others have it in the model but don't have it scripted) but that's the long-term goal.

Fans are generally a feature of gunships. This is a bomber and should probably have rotating jets. Think classic TA Thunder bomber.

If this is for a new constructor for -both- factories, add some construction mechanism and it's good. Of course the real burden is texturing, you can try using the fighter texture on it which we've already used 4 times.
+0 / -0


11 years ago
quote:
Fans are generally a feature of gunships

Sadly, only two gunships of the whole selection have fans now. Most have those crazy always-raging jet exhausts.
+0 / -0
I am not too happy with how this one turned out.

Is this style or the original style better?

Edit: Removed bad pictures, see my next post for "this style".
+0 / -0


11 years ago
Try making the shape a bit more imaginative. I like the aesthetics of first concept, but second is much more interesting as a whole - just needs some polish.
+0 / -0
USrankZag
11 years ago
Here is a better model with the jets mounted on rotating wings.



+0 / -0


11 years ago
I think the first model looks more like a constructor although I do like the second model regardless. The bottom model looks like quite an expensive unit.
+0 / -0

11 years ago
It's somewhat strange in what direction the hindmost wings are "pointing" (in both pictures). But other than that it looks awesome!
+0 / -0
@MauranKilom The rear wings have a slight forward-sweep.
+0 / -0
Yes, but (in my eyes) it conflicts with the front wings pointing in the other direction... I mean, the forward-sweep would be cool if not for the front wings working against that...
+0 / -0
USrankZag
11 years ago
I can see what you mean.
+0 / -0


11 years ago
Real-world forward-swept-wing planes all have "back-swept" winglets on their front:




So nothing conflicting here.
+0 / -0
USrankZag
11 years ago
I am going to work on texturing the first one and I would like the fighter texture AUrankAdminSaktoth mentioned. Also, can I manually unwrap the model in Blender and texture it that way, or does Spring not support unwrapping? I read the Spring dev page on textures, but I saw no mention of how to apply the texture to the model.

Another thing, I can't find any good references for a nano-sprayer. Would just having a the nano-sprayer visible by texture be fine?
+0 / -0


11 years ago
UV unwrap is the only way to texture for spring. So yeah, it's supported.
+0 / -0