Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Back to List

DeltaSiegeDry Featured

By IceXuick
Rating:

DeltaSiegeDry * 4 - 10 Players * made by IceXuick(@dagdief.nl)
Size: 20 x 10

PLAY ON THIS MAP


Downloads: 43989
Manual downloads:
http://spring1.admin-box.com/downloads/spring/spring-maps/DeltaSiegeDry.sd7
http://api.springfiles.com/files/maps/deltasiegedry.sd7
http://zero-k.info/autoregistrator/maps/DeltaSiegeDry.sd7

Last battles

Bots B469170 3 on DeltaSiegeDry
Multiplayer B468620 6 on DeltaSiegeDry
Bots B468402 1 on DeltaSiegeDry
Bots B468240 2 on DeltaSiegeDry
Bots B468208 0 on DeltaSiegeDry
Multiplayer B467964 22 on DeltaSiegeDry
Multiplayer B467959 21 on DeltaSiegeDry
Multiplayer B467950 12 on DeltaSiegeDry
Bots B467471 3 on DeltaSiegeDry
Multiplayer B467469 19 on DeltaSiegeDry


Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort

ARrank1245
6 years ago
hola quiero jugar

+0 / -0

VErankLytimli95#old#197583
6 years ago
Nice Map and Great Textures, the desing the this map it's very strategic.
+0 / -0


NLrank[XIV]Floris
4 years ago
Kind request to remove this map from the mappool and stick to the deluxe version. The deluxe version has more space in the center and a bigger ramp.

This one is not suitable for ZK as it encourages long porc games. which on itself is bad. But it also lags out most computers.
+0 / -0

ATrankSkasi
4 years ago
Wut? Deluxe lags even more than this. Deluxe is "DSD meets speed metal".
+0 / -0


NLrank[XIV]Floris
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
Does it?

It is wider. It only has more map features.

I want it to prevent lag from the units the players have, not that of the map features.
+0 / -0


PLrankRafalpluk
4 years ago
Deluxe is larger in both dimensions, not only wider.
And yeah Deluxe lags even more.
+0 / -0


NLrank[XIV]Floris
4 years ago
sad face :'(

would that mean we'd have to take it out of the map pool entirely?
+0 / -0



MYrankAdminKingRaptor
4 years ago
Does DSD really lag more than other maps of same size?
+0 / -0


NLrank[XIV]Floris
4 years ago
no idea, but on dsd you are sure to end up in porc/lagfest
+0 / -0

ATrankSkasi
4 years ago
Deluxe is so bad because the heightmap is insane. Windgens are super duper efficient there and there's LOTS of space for them.

DSD on the other hand is much smaller, heights are less extreme, although windgen spam is still a very good idea.

In the end though, the best thing to do against lag is playing smaller games, or using a lower metalmult for spam maps.
+0 / -0


FIranksprang
4 years ago
(edited 4 years ago)
You know what? I'm starting to think it would be a good idea to cap the minimum wind bonus provided by hills to something sensible, so that epic windspam wouldn't be the correct thing to do on all the maps with high hills.
+0 / -0

GBrankTheSponge
4 years ago
I agree that the deluxe edition of this map is better. It is much bigger so porc is not as viable and it looks much better. Of all the battles I have played on the two maps, the ones on the deluxe version were much more dynamic and less centered around static area control.
+0 / -0



MYrankAdminKingRaptor
4 years ago
I'd support deluxe purely on the basis of the fact that it doesn't look totally ugly.
+0 / -0
Back to List