Loading...
Name:    Password:    (Forgot password / username? / Create an account)
Back to List

FinnsRevengeRV4 Featured

Planet Olympus

By Basic
Rating:

1v1 16x16 map by Basic.The island mexes give more metal
Size: 16 x 16

PLAY ON THIS MAP


Downloads: 7115
Manual downloads:
http://spring1.admin-box.com/downloads/spring/spring-maps/FinnsRevengeRV4.sd7
http://api.springfiles.com/files/maps/finnsrevengerv4.sd7
http://zero-k.info/autoregistrator/maps/FinnsRevengeRV4.sd7


Preview
Filter:    Player:  
Page of 2 (21 records)
sort
USrank[1uP]Willk
5 years ago


Very nice mixed map, with really 3 major feilds of control(air, sea, land).
+0 / -0
DErankNeonSturm
5 years ago
Good map
+0 / -0
PTrankMGS_Camo_Hunter8
5 years ago
Supcom rip off cuz this map comes from supcom name and everything
+0 / -0
GBrankAdminSaktoth
4 years ago

Donator star
Take a look at 'Supreme battlefield'. If you think this matters....
+0 / -0
ATrankSkasi
4 years ago

Donator star
moar leik Supcom stole shits, no?
+0 / -0
USrankDerpyTheGreat
3 years ago
Bump?
SUPREME COMMANDER TOLD ME HOW THIS PLAYS
+0 / -0
EErankAdminAnarchid
3 years ago
(edited 3 years ago)

This isn't mixed. This is hovers map, no exception. All other options are invalid.

A proper mixed map is where you can play cars, spiders and ships as equals.
+0 / -0
USrankFireplace
3 years ago
This works as a reasonably mixed map in a team game. On a 1v1, hovers have a clear advantage.

However, if this is the same version of the map I played lately, hovers can have some trouble going past the shore. It would help to smoothen the shores a little.
+0 / -0
USrankAdminJasper
3 years ago
Small islands have 4 metal per mex, should be reduced.
+0 / -0
EErankAdmin[ISP]Lauri
2 years ago

Donator star
Kind of a boring map. Being hover biased doesn't help the issue. Unfeature? Untag for 1v1?
+1 / -0
USrankAdminJasper
2 years ago
This is one of the better hover maps
+0 / -0
CArankAdminShadowfury333
2 years ago
I kinda like this map, but the water is messed up for some reason. It doesn't extend past the map boundaries properly.

That being said, it is basically Hover & LV, and the LV play is okay for interesting.
+0 / -0
AUrankAquanim
2 years ago
(edited 2 years ago)

AFAIK hover is basically the only playable fac here in 1v1. If you can't access the islands your opponent can take four supermex for free (ruling out land-only facs), all the mex are on land (ruling out ships).

It also seems too open for air/gunships and too flat/large for amph though these are contestable. Hover is certainly the only thing I've seen regularly played here (in 1v1, teams gets a mixture).

Even the "normal" mex are quite big (>2.5, I think) which makes the early game play out oddly.

I'm not sure any of these are good enough reasons to unfeature or untag but I certainly wouldn't call the map "standard".
+0 / -0
USrankAutoWar
2 years ago
Solution: Make the small island's edges untraversable by hover.
Upside: Big mexes have less influence on fac choice.
Downside: Airstart becomes valid.
+0 / -0
GBrankTheSponge
2 years ago
I don't think it should be unfeatured. The only problems I see with it are because of hovers (mostly daggers), not the map.
+1 / -0
PLrankSprung
2 years ago

Donator star
quote:
Downside: Airstart becomes valid.

...more facs being viable is a downside?
+1 / -0
EErankAdminAnarchid
2 years ago
I think rather than decreasing passability, it should/could be increased. Moving islands closer and providing fords that land units can reach at a minimal speed malus. Relocating the other mexes so that ships can somehow reach them.

The map won't be the same though. The result won't be Finn's.
+2 / -0
EErankAdmin[ISP]Lauri
2 years ago
(edited 2 years ago)


Donator star
quote:
This is one of the better hover maps

Any flat-ish map is a great hover map, dry or wet. If I want to play hovers I might as well as play Red Comet or Titan Duel, but at least there I can have interesting matchups against other facs (although hover mirrors aren't rare either).

Here you are almost forced to take hovers so it's like a less diverse and more boring version of those dry maps.

I'd unfeature it until hovers stop being dominant on dry maps and a hover map would actually be interesting, but meh. Need more opinions.
+0 / -0
PLrankOrfelius
2 years ago
(edited 2 years ago)


Donator star
quote:
I'd unfeature it until hovers stop being dominant on dry maps and a hover map would actually be interesting, but meh. Need more opinions.

Its a decent map for team games too. Instead of unfeaturing i would suggest to remove 1v1 tag.
+1 / -0
EErankAdminAnarchid
2 years ago
Stop unfeaturing things. Demand Supported/Featured taxonomy and meta-maps.
+3 / -0
Page of 2 (21 records)
Back to List