1 |
[i]I will allow you four lies, Mede. You've already used up two of them.[/i]
|
1 |
[i]I will allow you four lies, Mede. You've already used up two of them.[/i]
|
2 |
-Belisarius, [i]An Oblique Approach[/i], Eric Flint and David Drake
|
2 |
-Belisarius, [i]An Oblique Approach[/i], Eric Flint and David Drake
|
3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
4 |
[quote]I suspect that I am being confused and unjustly accredited with the [...] steam forum thread.[/quote]
|
4 |
[quote]I suspect that I am being confused and unjustly accredited with the [...] steam forum thread.[/quote]
|
5 |
You, toot, are zerpzerp in [url=http://springrts.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=28853]this Spring forum thread[/url] (this is easily verified by the IP records). SoCheese in the Greenlight comment thread is thus clearly you, for reasons I've already explained [url=http://zero-k.info/Forum/Post/105477#105477]here[/url]. Lie #1.
|
5 |
You, toot, are zerpzerp in [url=http://springrts.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=28853]this Spring forum thread[/url] (this is easily verified by the IP records). SoCheese in the Greenlight comment thread is thus clearly you, for reasons I've already explained [url=http://zero-k.info/Forum/Post/105477#105477]here[/url]. Lie #1.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
[quote]I would have served the 1 month ban politely in order to not cause I stir.[/quote]
|
7 |
[quote]I would have served the 1 month ban politely in order to not cause I stir.[/quote]
|
8 |
Your response to the 1 week lobby ban was to make not one, but two baww threads on forum, in which you accused me of all manner of misdeeds. Your response to previous bans was to defame the ZK team using smurfs in at least two instances, and apparently to ban dodge multiple times as well. I have about as much reason to believe you'd be nice and quiet about this one for the sake of avoiding drama as I do to believe your typical domestic abuser when he promises not to do it again without any oversight. Lie #2.
|
8 |
Your response to the 1 week lobby ban was to make not one, but two baww threads on forum, in which you accused me of all manner of misdeeds. Your response to previous bans was to defame the ZK team using smurfs in at least two instances, and apparently to ban dodge multiple times as well. I have about as much reason to believe you'd be nice and quiet about this one for the sake of avoiding drama as I do to believe your typical domestic abuser when he promises not to do it again without any oversight. Lie #2.
|
9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
10 |
[quote]Sure I troll a game now and then, and every one has a rage fit occasionally[/quote]
|
10 |
[quote]Sure I troll a game now and then, and every one has a rage fit occasionally[/quote]
|
11 |
No mention of how you repeatedly and deliberately lied, misrepresented others, and generally engaged in intellectual dishonesty during forum conversations (we'll leave aside all the times you verbally abused others on this forum). This is practically Lie #2.5.
|
11 |
No mention of how you repeatedly and deliberately lied, misrepresented others, and generally engaged in intellectual dishonesty during forum conversations (we'll leave aside all the times you verbally abused others on this forum). This is practically Lie #2.5.
|
12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
13 |
[quote]My penalties are the result solely of not deescalating conflicts during the course of games. Whether it was harsh language at failing players or general discontent, never did I blatantly grief or trolled a game solely for the purpose of harming other players.[/quote]
|
13 |
[quote]My penalties are the result solely of not deescalating conflicts during the course of games. Whether it was harsh language at failing players or general discontent, never did I blatantly grief or trolled a game solely for the purpose of harming other players.[/quote]
|
14 |
You
have
previous
bans
for,
among
other
things,
spec
cheating,
teamkilling
(
and
I
don't
mean
this
recent
case)
and
[url=http://zero-k.
info/Battles/Detail/178596]teamkilling
then
attempting
to
frame
someone
for
it[/url].
The
fact
that
you
apparently
think
your
intent
not
being
"solely"
to
harm
other
players
(
pull
the
other
one)
does
not
incline
me
to
do
anything
that
would
let
you
back
in
the
game.
|
14 |
You
have
previous
bans
for,
among
other
things,
spec
cheating,
teamkilling
(
and
I
don't
mean
this
recent
case)
and
[url=http://zero-k.
info/Battles/Detail/178596]teamkilling
then
attempting
to
frame
someone
for
it[/url].
The
fact
that
you
apparently
think
your
intent
not
being
"solely"
to
harm
other
players
(
pull
the
other
one)
constitutes
an
excuse
does
not
incline
me
to
do
anything
that
would
let
you
back
in
the
game.
|
15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
16 |
You now get to persuade me your argument with @Kualabear isn't a sock puppet show, either done alone or with @[Anteep]. Start by explaining why the only two IPs recorded to user @HonkHonk ( http://zero-k.info/Users/Detail/263796 ) are your home IP, and Anteep's.
|
16 |
You now get to persuade me your argument with @Kualabear isn't a sock puppet show, either done alone or with @[Anteep]. Start by explaining why the only two IPs recorded to user @HonkHonk ( http://zero-k.info/Users/Detail/263796 ) are your home IP, and Anteep's.
|