Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

COC Violation & NOT spamming

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/17/2014 2:49:01 PMMYrankAdminHistidine before revert after revert
Before After
1 Ah, the mask slips. 1 Ah, the mask slips.
2 \n 2 \n
3 [quote]@KingRaptor I am not @[Anteep]. There is no possible way @HONKAHONK has the same IP as @[Anteep].[/quote] 3 [quote]@KingRaptor I am not @[Anteep]. There is no possible way @HONKAHONK has the same IP as @[Anteep].[/quote]
4 Are you actually going to address the claims I actually made, or only the ones you think I made? 4 Are you actually going to address the claims I actually made, or only the ones you think I made?
5 \n 5 \n
6 [quote]I did not make DM spam, I use flobby.[/quote] 6 [quote]I did not make DM spam, I use flobby.[/quote]
7 A complete non sequitur. 7 A complete non sequitur.
8 \n 8 \n
9 [quote]You are making assumptions based on public content[/quote] 9 [quote]You are making assumptions based on public content[/quote]
10 So what, I should make assumptions based on your say-so instead of the evidence? 10 So what, I should make assumptions based on your say-so instead of the evidence?
11 \n 11 \n
12 [quote]I made ZK threads contesting and showing my case because you feel it necessary to throw insults then lock threads to make it unable to respond. You throw out some kinda of threat then prevent users from responding. I wasn't the only one in that thread that brought your demeanor up.[/quote] 12 [quote]I made ZK threads contesting and showing my case because you feel it necessary to throw insults then lock threads to make it unable to respond. You throw out some kinda of threat then prevent users from responding. I wasn't the only one in that thread that brought your demeanor up.[/quote]
13 1) There is nothing in either of my posts in [url=http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/9624]"Why exactly?[/url] that can be reasonably construed as an insult. Lie #3. 13 1) There is nothing in either of my posts in [url=http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/9624]"Why exactly?[/url] that can be reasonably construed as an insult. Lie #3.
14 \n 14 \n
15 2) I locked the thread because it was demonstrated that you had no intention of having a reasonable discussion. That is my prerogative as a moderator. 15 2) I locked the thread because it was demonstrated that you had no intention of having a reasonable discussion. That is my prerogative as a moderator.
16 I threatened to impose more severe penalties on you if you were made another baww thread in violation of the rules, which is also my prerogative as a mod. You did, so I did. 16 I threatened to impose more severe penalties on you if you were made another baww thread in violation of the rules, which is also my prerogative as a mod. You did, so I did.
17 \n 17 \n
18 3) If you want to cite the endorsement of someone like Drone as a good thing instead of [url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/YourApprovalFillsMeWithShame]treating it in the appropriate manner[/url], you're welcome to to it. 18 3) If you want to cite the endorsement of someone like Drone as a good thing instead of [url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/YourApprovalFillsMeWithShame]treating it in the appropriate manner[/url], you're welcome to to it.
19 \n 19 \n
20 [quote]WTF is "intellectual dishonesty"? Someone doesn't agree with you on something so you ban, block, or otherwise punish them. Get over yourself.[/quote]
21 http://lmgtfy.com/?q=intellectual+dishonesty&l=1
22 \n
23 Or if you want a specific instance of you doing that: [url=http://springrts.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=531286#p531286]here[/url]
24 (I'm being generous and not counting the obviously faulty arguments like "I won the game, my teamkilling was perfectly okay!)
25 \n
20 [quote]THAT IS NOT AN ACCOUNT I CREATED !!![/quote] 26 [quote]THAT IS NOT AN ACCOUNT I CREATED !!![/quote]
21 Yeah, you didn't create it (nor did I say you did), it only has your IP. I asked you to explain why it does. You seem to be unable or unwilling to do this. 27 Yeah, you didn't create it (nor did I say you did), it only has your IP. I asked you to explain why it does. You seem to be unable or unwilling to do this.
22 \n 28 \n
23 [quote]I have been playing spring since the time before CA. In the 4 years of dealing with insanity from admins like you, If I was going to pull something it would have been years ago.[/quote] 29 [quote]I have been playing spring since the time before CA. In the 4 years of dealing with insanity from admins like you, If I was going to pull something it would have been years ago.[/quote]
24 "I didn't murder that guy all this time, so I wouldn't do it now!" What an obviously silly argument. 30 "I didn't murder that guy all this time, so I wouldn't do it now!" What an obviously silly argument.
25 \n 31 \n
26 [quote]I fully stand by my post that you should have your admin removed. This proves it even more.[/quote] 32 [quote]I fully stand by my post that you should have your admin removed. This proves it even more.[/quote]
27 Fascinating narrative, companion. How about your posts that prove you should, in fact, be permabanned? 33 Fascinating narrative, companion. How about your posts that prove you should, in fact, be permabanned?
34 \n
35 [quote]If you are falsifying IP logs or data in the admin side of the site to hide your mistake, that is despicable.[/quote]
36 And I'm the one charged with "throwing out baseless accusations." Sure.
37 \n
38 So, here is what [i]I[/i] think happened:
39 - You got banned, made baww threads about it.
40 - Anteep subsequently contacted you (he made posts on the second thread with the line "We're working on something big, so don't worry" which were subsequently deleted), possibly sharing one or more of his tools with you. Exhibit A: the HONKHONK account in common.
41 - You colluded with him to troll the ZK community. This fact alone is sufficient grounds for the permaban as far as I'm concerned, regardless of whether you actually directly participated in the PM spam or not.
28 \n 42 \n
29 You have one lie left. I suggest not wasting it. 43 You have one lie left. I suggest not wasting it.