1 |
I'd recommend avoiding an ordinal list, and instead having tiers.
|
1 |
I'd recommend avoiding an ordinal list, and instead having tiers.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
Something like (Based on @SnuggleBass's list and justifications):
|
3 |
Something like (Based on @SnuggleBass's list and justifications):
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
S: Glaive (microed)
|
5 |
S: Glaive (microed)
|
6 |
A: Duck, Bandit, Scorcher, Panther, Pyro
|
6 |
A: Duck, Bandit, Scorcher, Panther, Pyro
|
7 |
B: Flea, Kodachi, Glaive (unmicroed)
|
7 |
B: Flea, Kodachi, Glaive (unmicroed)
|
8 |
C: Dagger, Dart, Puppy
|
8 |
C: Dagger, Dart, Puppy
|
9 |
F:
|
9 |
F:
|
10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
11 |
Ordinal lists make it hard to tell how close or far the perceived power differential is compared to tier lists.
|
11 |
Ordinal lists make it hard to tell how close or far the perceived power differential is compared to tier lists.
|
|
|
12 |
\n
|
|
|
13 |
Note that having nothing in S or F tiers is fine, as S tier is basically "absolute best with no rivals" and is something of a signal to adjust things, and F is "never use if you want to win", and the same sort of signal.
|