Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Forum Rated Raiders

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
6/9/2015 4:16:09 PMCArankAdminShadowfury333 before revert after revert
6/9/2015 4:14:16 PMCArankAdminShadowfury333 before revert after revert
6/9/2015 4:13:55 PMCArankAdminShadowfury333 before revert after revert
Before After
1 I'd recommend avoiding an ordinal list, and instead having tiers. 1 I'd recommend avoiding an ordinal list, and instead having tiers.
2 \n 2 \n
3 Something like (Based on @SnuggleBass's list and justifications): 3 Something like (Based on @SnuggleBass's list and justifications):
4 \n 4 \n
5 S: Glaive (microed) 5 S: Glaive (microed)
6 A: Duck, Bandit, Scorcher, Panther, Pyro 6 A: Duck, Bandit, Scorcher, Panther, Pyro
7 B: Flea, Kodachi, Glaive (unmicroed) 7 B: Flea, Kodachi, Glaive (unmicroed)
8 C: Dagger, Dart, Puppy 8 C: Dagger, Dart, Puppy
9 F: 9 F:
10 \n 10 \n
11 Ordinal lists make it hard to tell how close or far the perceived power differential is compared to tier lists. 11 Ordinal lists make it hard to tell how close or far the perceived power differential is compared to tier lists.
12 \n
13 Note that having nothing in S or F tiers is fine, as S tier is basically "absolute best with no rivals" and is something of a signal to adjust things, and F is "never use if you want to win", and the same sort of signal.