| 1 |
@Yogzototh
|
1 |
@Yogzototh
|
| 2 |
[quote]Why were the 20 glaives clustered up?[/quote] Because pathing.
|
2 |
[quote]Why were the 20 glaives clustered up?[/quote] Because pathing.
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
[quote]why didnt they just dodge the bombs[/quote] Who knows, maybe EMP. Phoenix is super fast and all-terrain+hover compared to ground units, so can bomb a swarm of Glaives that were Tick'ed far away. Or maybe there was a chokepoint. Or a defensive Faraday and very good timing. Or maybe there were 4 Phoenixes so they couldn't really dodge easily.
|
4 |
[quote]why didnt they just dodge the bombs[/quote] Who knows, maybe EMP. Phoenix is super fast and all-terrain+hover compared to ground units, so can bomb a swarm of Glaives that were Tick'ed far away. Or maybe there was a chokepoint. Or a defensive Faraday and very good timing. Or maybe there were 4 Phoenixes so they couldn't really dodge easily.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
[quote]Why would you bomb windgenfarm with phoenix, which needs to rearm and do it in multiple runs, if you can kill it with fleas or banshees?[/quote] Maybe because it's the fastest. Rearming is often not needed (same as for ground raids). Also sometimes you can not kill it with Fleas (water) or Banshees.
|
6 |
[quote]Why would you bomb windgenfarm with phoenix, which needs to rearm and do it in multiple runs, if you can kill it with fleas or banshees?[/quote] Maybe because it's the fastest. Rearming is often not needed (same as for ground raids). Also sometimes you can not kill it with Fleas (water) or Banshees.
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
[quote]Phoenix is not some sort of ultra micro-intensive unit like placeholder.[/quote] I don't understand that comparison. Phoenix can require quite some micro, Placeholder can sometimes require almost no micro.
|
8 |
[quote]Phoenix is not some sort of ultra micro-intensive unit like placeholder.[/quote] I don't understand that comparison. Phoenix can require quite some micro, Placeholder can sometimes require almost no micro.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
[quote]If
it
was
good,
it
would
be
popular.
[/quote]
Don't
get
me
wrong,
I
do
want
Phoenix
to
be
slightly
more
useful.
|
10 |
[quote]If
it
was
good,
it
would
be
popular.
[/quote]
Don't
get
me
wrong,
I
do
want
Phoenix
to
be
slightly
more
useful.
It's
just
the
initial
argument
"doesn't
make
cost"
is
not
a
tautology.
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
@Pxtl, @Forever:
|
12 |
@Pxtl, @Forever:
|
| 13 |
That still doesn't mean units can get below shields. Why not just up HP and give it autorepair then?
|
13 |
That still doesn't mean units can get below shields. Why not just up HP and give it autorepair then?
|
Kestrel and other air non-used units