| 1 |
[quote]What if that anti covers enemy base too (in that FFA situation)? [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]What if that anti covers enemy base too (in that FFA situation)? [/quote]
|
| 2 |
In most ffas that is unlikely, and disabling your anti also exposes your base in most cases.
|
2 |
In most ffas that is unlikely, and disabling your anti also exposes your base in most cases.
|
| 3 |
There might be some cases where you have an anti that covers an area where you only have low-valued stuff, then it would be ok to completely disable it. But anyway, who would build an anti just for covering stuff which you don't mind losing?
|
3 |
There might be some cases where you have an anti that covers an area where you only have low-valued stuff, then it would be ok to completely disable it. But anyway, who would build an anti just for covering stuff which you don't mind losing?
|
|
|
4 |
The scenarios for that option to be useful are so unlikely that I wouldn't bother with it (you always can reclaim to 99% as sprang said). Nevertheless, the scenario I mentioned previously is way more common in maps like throne so the feature i proposed would have an use.
|
|
|
5 |
I'm not going to implement it, just doing some neonstorming
|
Buff nuke