1 |
[quote]Why not have antis be On/Off-able? In their ON state, they intercept nukes flying into their coverage; in their OFF state, have them intercept only nukes that will hit inside their zone? [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]Why not have antis be On/Off-able? In their ON state, they intercept nukes flying into their coverage; in their OFF state, have them intercept only nukes that will hit inside their zone? [/quote]
|
2 |
I was saying that completely disabling the anti would be bad, hence the on/off button would be bad.
|
2 |
I was saying that completely disabling the anti would be bad, hence the on/off button would be bad.
|
3 |
The idea you proposed is the same I did, but I wouldn't name that button on/off since it would cause confusion.
|
3 |
The idea you proposed is the same I did, but I wouldn't name that button on/off since it would cause confusion.
|
|
|
4 |
\n
|
|
|
5 |
[quote]If we had signatures here[/quote]
|
|
|
6 |
We absolutely need signatures!
|