| 1 |
To
clear
this
up,
the
assumption
of
@AutoWar
re.
SpringFeatures
was
likely
prompted
by
something
I
said
[url=http://zero-k.
info/Forum/Thread/20491]here[/url]
hypothesising
about
the
"special"
tag.
To
the
best
of
my
knowledge
maps
without
SpringFeatures
and
maps
with
SpringFeatures
v1.
0
are
not
automatically
tagged
silly
(
Fairyland
was
not,
at
the
time
it
used
SF
rather
than
copies
of
the
relevant
features)
and
I
see
no
reason
why
somebody
would
manually
have
done
so.
Therefore
I
wonder
if
SF
v1.
6,
being
newer,
is
perhaps
not
registered
as
a
"not-silly
dependency".
|
1 |
To
clear
this
up,
the
assumption
of
@AutoWar
re.
SpringFeatures
was
likely
prompted
by
something
I
said
[url=http://zero-k.
info/Forum/Thread/20491]here[/url]
hypothesising
about
the
"special"
tag.
To
the
best
of
my
knowledge
maps
without
SpringFeatures
and
maps
with
SpringFeatures
v1.
0
are
not
automatically
tagged
silly
(
Fairyland
was
not,
at
the
time
it
used
SF
rather
than
copies
of
the
relevant
features)
and
I
see
no
reason
why
somebody
would
manually
have
done
so.
Therefore
I
wonder
if
SF
v1.
6,
being
newer,
is
perhaps
not
registered
as
a
"not-silly
dependency"
at
this
time.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
@Sprung could dial back the arrogant dismissal a few notches. I kinda think Forb overreacted but understandably.
|
3 |
@Sprung could dial back the arrogant dismissal a few notches. I kinda think Forb overreacted but understandably.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
[quote]I forgot to add, that in the latest spring features, features generally have resource values of 0. This is to prevent oshit imbalances by newbie mappers. [/quote]
|
5 |
[quote]I forgot to add, that in the latest spring features, features generally have resource values of 0. This is to prevent oshit imbalances by newbie mappers. [/quote]
|
| 6 |
http://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/31026 :p :p :p
|
6 |
http://zero-k.info/Maps/Detail/31026 :p :p :p
|
Map Battle for Planet XIV - v03