1 |
[quote]Is it worth even supporting[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]Is it worth even supporting[/quote]
|
2 |
[quote]Imo its not. (...) This map definetely is NOT broken in any way.[/quote]
|
2 |
[quote]Imo its not. (...) This map definetely is NOT broken in any way.[/quote]
|
3 |
I think you mixed something up in your reply @Orfelius. Should've been "Imo it is."?
|
3 |
I think you mixed something up in your reply @Orfelius. Should've been "Imo it is."?
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
Also
agreed,
when
nothing's
broken
then
definitely
tag
a
map
as
"supported".
The
"featured"
tag
is
the
one
used
to
decide
whether
maps
are
"good"
or
"fit
the
gameplay"
of
ZK.
For
more
fine
tuning
use
the
map
rating
option
(
if
it
doesn't
work,
fix
it)
.
|
5 |
Also
agreed,
when
nothing's
broken
then
definitely
tag
a
map
as
"supported".
The
"featured"
tag
is
the
one
used
to
decide
whether
maps
are
"good"
and
"fit
the
gameplay"
of
ZK.
For
more
fine
tuning
use
the
map
rating
option
(
if
it
doesn't
work,
fix
it)
.
|