| 1 |
On
the
one
hand,
the
"point
at
the
sign
saying
'good
morning'"
analogy
is
very
fitting.
It
removes
the
illusion
that
you
[i]actually[/i]
care/meant
what
you
said.
|
1 |
On
the
one
hand,
the
"point
at
the
sign
saying
'good
morning'"
analogy
is
very
fitting.
It
removes
the
illusion
that
you
[i]actually[/i]
care/meant
what
you
said,
even
if
it
would
be
practical.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
On the other hand, it's not hard to make a widget that is virtually indistinguishable from human-typed greetings: Aside from the timing randomization @Skasi presented, you can also draw from a pool of messages (include slight spelling errors/variances for extra flavor) and maybe add a bit of weighting, a bit of date-dependency... You get the idea.
|
3 |
On the other hand, it's not hard to make a widget that is virtually indistinguishable from human-typed greetings: Aside from the timing randomization @Skasi presented, you can also draw from a pool of messages (include slight spelling errors/variances for extra flavor) and maybe add a bit of weighting, a bit of date-dependency... You get the idea.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
I guess with the hinted policies, our coders might be the ones finally reliably beating the Turing test?
|
5 |
I guess with the hinted policies, our coders might be the ones finally reliably beating the Turing test?
|
Muted and kicked from server for good luck widget