| 1 |
So... who is favored in this match according to various theories?
|
1 |
So... who is favored in this match according to various theories?
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Also, if I'm reading @Brackman 's more recent post correctly, then any elo difference of 0 will still be optimal (because, as he shows, it gets multiplied with his newly introduced factor. Or, well, it's obvious by just inputting an eloDiff of 0).
|
3 |
Also, if I'm reading @Brackman 's more recent post correctly, then any elo difference of 0 will still be optimal (because, as he shows, it gets multiplied with his newly introduced factor. Or, well, it's obvious by just inputting an eloDiff of 0).
|
| 4 |
[color=red]Edit:
I'm
talking
about
his
"distinctivity
modificator",
as
introduced
in
the
post
linked
by
@Skasi.
.
The
general
ELO
business
has
been
discussed
[url=http://zero-k.
info/Forum/Thread/7402?postID=89751#89751]here[/url],
or
(
if
you
can't
stomach
that)
see
further
below.
[/color]
|
4 |
[color=red]Edit:
I'm
talking
about
his
"distinctivity
modificator",
as
introduced
in
the
post
linked
by
@Skasi
.
The
general
ELO
business
has
been
discussed
[url=http://zero-k.
info/Forum/Thread/7402?postID=89751#89751]here[/url],
or
(
if
you
can't
stomach
that)
see
further
below.
[/color]
|
| 5 |
[b]So his new system would not penalize this particular team balance in any way.[/b] It would remain the best solution.
|
5 |
[b]So his new system would not penalize this particular team balance in any way.[/b] It would remain the best solution.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Whatever change we make to the balancer system, it would have to clearly define whether team "high elo variance" (HEV) or team "low elo variance" (LEV) are better off. Because, as shown above, if neither are considered better off, you'll keep getting these balancer outputs.
|
7 |
Whatever change we make to the balancer system, it would have to clearly define whether team "high elo variance" (HEV) or team "low elo variance" (LEV) are better off. Because, as shown above, if neither are considered better off, you'll keep getting these balancer outputs.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
From what I remember, people seem to agree that it's obvious which team is favored. But then it turns out that they don't agree [i]which[/i] one is favored.
|
9 |
From what I remember, people seem to agree that it's obvious which team is favored. But then it turns out that they don't agree [i]which[/i] one is favored.
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
PS: Who broke apostrophes after @<PlayerName>?
|
11 |
PS: Who broke apostrophes after @<PlayerName>?
|
Balancer broken?