| 1 |
Maybe saying worse isn't technically correct, still I don't wanna think about all the issues I and my AI ran into with engine pathing. I don't trust the pathfinder to find the shortest(time wise) path.
|
1 |
Maybe saying worse isn't technically correct, still I don't wanna think about all the issues I and my AI ran into with engine pathing. I don't trust the pathfinder to find the shortest(time wise) path.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
When you then add deformable terrain it gets unusable for distances > 200 elmo. Also it isn't accurate enough for positioning spiders on cliffs(because 2D map).
|
3 |
When you then add deformable terrain it gets unusable for distances > 200 elmo. Also it isn't accurate enough for positioning spiders on cliffs(because 2D map).
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
What the CSI Pathfinder does differently: Avoid steep hills/narrow passages, stay in formation/don't cluster, civilians avoid enemy contact. This relies on Spring pathing for the elmo level accuracy though, it's a simplified version of how a player has to correct unit paths.
|
5 |
What the CSI Pathfinder does differently: Avoid steep hills/narrow passages, stay in formation/don't cluster, civilians avoid enemy contact. This relies on Spring pathing for the elmo level accuracy though, it's a simplified version of how a player has to correct unit paths.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
One
Issue
that
is
new
to
me
is
units
actively
running
into
and
getting
stuck
in
Strider
nanoframes.
|
7 |
One
issue
that
is
new
to
me
is
units
actively
running
into
and
getting
stuck
in
Strider
nanoframes.
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
That said I don't think Spring's pathfinding is worse than similar games. But if somebody asks me whether I feel a difference between 91 pathing and 101 it is not the case for me (and I'm not gonna lie). A noticeable improvement would be the addition of some boids like behaviour that avoids all your raiders clumping at the first corner.
|
Zero-K 1v1 Tournament 4th of June 2016