Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

ZK Social group visualization attempt

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
6/25/2016 10:43:09 PMGBrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
6/25/2016 10:32:48 PMGBrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
Before After
1 @Skasi If you define 0/0 as 0 @Brackman will come for you. 1 @Skasi If you define 0/0 as 0 @Brackman will come for you.
2 \n 2 \n
3 There is nobody on this simulation to whom this would apply. The chosen ones have at least cast 90 votes or are part of the top50 posters. 3 There is nobody in this simulation to whom this would apply. The chosen ones have at least cast 90 votes or are part of the top50 posters.
4 \n 4 \n
5 @Anarchid to fit the action on screen I reduced the players to the top20 posters(Which means different interactions) and reduced all repelling forces by a ton. That's the only way I could get @[ffc]killer on screen. 5 @Anarchid to fit the action on screen I reduced the players to the top20 posters(Which means different interactions) and reduced all repelling forces by a ton. That's the only way I could get @[ffc]killer on screen.
6 \n
7 So my assumption is that @Saktoth relations to the top20 posters might be better and still he is a bit outside of the cluster, only neighbouring Fred.
8 \n
9 While the outcome of this simulation might not be very meaningful, it is generally reproducible. @Pxtl and @Anarchid as well as @sprang and @Sprung mostly pair up while @Skasi and @Chesti usually end up at the edge of the cluster.