| 1 |
[quote]I'm concerned that players in the 1400 elo range are in the top 50 list for 1v1. This shows that previously active players have stopped playing 1v1s and been removed from the list.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]I'm concerned that players in the 1400 elo range are in the top 50 list for 1v1. This shows that previously active players have stopped playing 1v1s and been removed from the list.[/quote]
|
| 2 |
The main reason for this was definitely the code change for ladder generation. Ladders now omit players who do not play the respective game type. [url=https://github.com/ZeroK-RTS/Zero-K-Infrastructure/commit/4c3a0d0fe0fec2de925baed7b0c32e7a48d830c4]This happened ~4 months ago.[/url]
|
2 |
The main reason for this was definitely the code change for ladder generation. Ladders now omit players who do not play the respective game type. [url=https://github.com/ZeroK-RTS/Zero-K-Infrastructure/commit/4c3a0d0fe0fec2de925baed7b0c32e7a48d830c4]This happened ~4 months ago.[/url]
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
On
14.
May
2016,
1543
1v1
elo
was
enough
to
make
it
into
top50.
That
was
~1.
5
months
after
the
change.
Now
1543
1v1
elo
is
enough
to
make
it
into
top34.
I
assume
that
this
might've
been
caused
by
the
recent
infra
drama.
|
4 |
On
14.
May
2016,
1543
1v1
elo
was
enough
to
make
it
into
top50.
That
was
~1.
5
months
after
the
change.
Now
1543
1v1
elo
is
enough
to
make
it
into
top34.
I
assume
that
this
might've
been
caused
by
the
recent
infra
drama.
It
could
also
be
possible
that
elo
was
recalculated
from
replays
after
some
changes
to
its
formula
caused
by
all
the
math
threads,
I
didn't
follow
any
of
them
too
much.
|
1v1 Discussion