| 1 |
The teamstrength implementation was changing ELO ratings during the calculation. (The evaluation system was working correctly, seems this unwanted bug yielded a slight improvement :D)
|
1 |
The teamstrength implementation was changing ELO ratings during the calculation. (The evaluation system was working correctly, seems this unwanted bug yielded a slight improvement :D)
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Results:
|
3 |
Results:
|
| 4 |
[spoiler]
|
4 |
[spoiler]
|
| 5 |
1v1:
|
5 |
1v1:
|
| 6 |
{{{Teamstrength without Coms: 0.22747797449491305
|
6 |
{{{Teamstrength without Coms: 0.22747797449491305
|
| 7 |
ZK Elo: 0.22747797449491308
|
7 |
ZK Elo: 0.22747797449491308
|
| 8 |
Teamstrength with Coms: 0.22747797449491305}}}
|
8 |
Teamstrength with Coms: 0.22747797449491305}}}
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
Teams:
|
10 |
Teams:
|
| 11 |
{{{
|
11 |
{{{
|
| 12 |
ZK
Elo
(
K=16)
:
0.
02363267699061964
|
12 |
ZK
Elo:
0.
023980837112044084
|
| 13 |
ZK
Elo:
0.
0322964809911929
|
13 |
ZK
Elo
(
K=64)
:
0.
02683235735477585
|
| 14 |
ZK
Elo
(
K=64)
:
0.
03733725820350313
|
14 |
Teamstrength
without
Coms:
0.
018535611537062093
|
| 15 |
ZK
Elo
(
K=128)
:
0.
024928997327482584
|
15 |
Teamstrength
with
Coms:
0.
018567291478910775
|
| 16 |
Teamstrength
without
Coms:
0.
029091448997986557
|
16 |
Teamstrength
without
Coms
(
K=64)
:
0.
022331963626771544
|
| 17 |
Teamstrength
with
Coms:
0.
029091448997986585
|
17 |
Teamstrength
with
Coms
(
K=64)
:
0.
022197582594406972
|
| 18 |
Teamstrength without Coms (K=64): 0.03608480771944673
|
|
|
| 19 |
Teamstrength with Coms (K=64): 0.03608480771944678
|
|
|
| 20 |
}}}
|
18 |
}}}
|
| 21 |
\n
|
19 |
\n
|
| 22 |
2v2:
|
20 |
2v2:
|
| 23 |
{{{Teamstrength without Coms: 0.029091448997986557
|
21 |
{{{Teamstrength without Coms: 0.029091448997986557
|
| 24 |
ZK Elo: 0.0322964809911929
|
22 |
ZK Elo: 0.0322964809911929
|
| 25 |
Teamstrength with Coms: 0.029091448997986585}}}
|
23 |
Teamstrength with Coms: 0.029091448997986585}}}
|
| 26 |
\n
|
24 |
\n
|
| 27 |
[/spoiler]
|
25 |
[/spoiler]
|
| 28 |
\n
|
26 |
\n
|
| 29 |
The best K value for ZK ELO seems to lie between 63 and 64 (currently it's 32).
|
27 |
The best K value for ZK ELO seems to lie between 63 and 64 (currently it's 32).
|