| 1 |
A mapfeaturer who does feature or unfeature maps serves no purpose.
|
1 |
A mapfeaturer who does feature or unfeature maps serves no purpose.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
[quote]I see no reason why some of them can't come back in the future[/quote]I see plently reason. Most importantly the question:
|
3 |
[quote]I see no reason why some of them can't come back in the future[/quote]I see plently reason. Most importantly the question:
|
| 4 |
[i]Come back to what?[/i] Not much left to come back too!
|
4 |
[i]Come back to what?[/i] Not much left to come back too!
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
[quote] I'd find it worth playing even if the community literally consisted of only 10 players.[/quote]Does not matter if it 'would be be worth playing.' If playercount goes so low then it becomes increasingly unlikely to encounter other online players.
|
6 |
[quote] I'd find it worth playing even if the community literally consisted of only 10 players.[/quote]Does not matter if it 'would be be worth playing.' If playercount goes so low then it becomes increasingly unlikely to encounter other online players.
|
| 7 |
zK wanted exponential growth, more players to attract more players, instead got exponentional shrinkage.
|
7 |
zK wanted exponential growth, more players to attract more players, instead got exponentional shrinkage.
|
| 8 |
Bit
strange
to
keep
telling
how
you
are
totally
fine
with
10
players
after
zK
had
aimed
for
thousands
of
players
and
in
turn
lost
hundreds.
|
8 |
Bit
strange
to
keep
telling
how
you
are
totally
fine
with
10
players
after
zK
had
aimed
for
thousands
of
players
and
in
turn
lost
hundreds.
For
10
players
it
did
not
need
this
steamdream
shit.
|
Battle plots