Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Single tower not good?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
10/13/2016 6:54:36 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
10/13/2016 6:53:33 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
Before After
1 1 defender = 1, 5 glaive dead in almost every situation but 2 defenders = 3 glaives dead is much more cost effective than the option 1. 1 1 defender equals 1, 5 glaive dead in almost every situation. However 2 defenders equals 3 glaives dead is much more cost effective than the option 1.
2 That being said while building defences you probably want to have them in range of each other so that they are able to support each other if some kind of assault happens. Also solars around llts are good to keep schorchers and glaives sort of away from your turret (and they give energy during the downtime). 2 That being said while building defences you probably want to have them in range of each other so that they are able to support each other if some kind of assault happens. Also solars around llts are good to keep schorchers and glaives sort of away from your turret (and they give energy during the downtime).
3 \n 3 \n
4 edit: What the hell is wrong with this forum formatting? I can't even use two "=" in the same sentence... 4 edit: What the hell is wrong with this forum formatting? I can't even use two "=" in the same sentence...