1 |
What does the top 50 have to do with it? I've been playing spring engine games almost exclusively since 2006.
|
1 |
What does the top 50 have to do with it? I've been playing spring engine games almost exclusively since 2006.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
I
disagree
with
the
whole
sentiment.
AI
is
notoriously
bad
at
playing
RTS,
and
I
think
Zero
K
is
the
most
complex
RTS
game
on
the
market.
Game
balance
is
extremely
complex,
handling
of
units
and
economy
is
very
nuanced.
That
AI
is
playing
the
game
to
this
standard
is
a
miracle.
Please
tell
me
another
RTS
that
has
better
AI
than
seen
here
besides
Starcraft
1?
|
3 |
I
disagree
with
the
whole
sentiment
of
your
post.
|
|
|
4 |
\n
|
|
|
5 |
AI is notoriously bad at playing RTS, and I think Zero K is mechanically one of the most complex RTS game on the market. Game balance is extremely complex, handling of units and economy is very nuanced. That AI is playing the game to this standard is a miracle. Please tell me another RTS that has better AI than seen in the spring engine besides Starcraft 1?
|
|
|
6 |
\n
|
|
|
7 |
What makes Zero K even harder to beat using AI is that players have such a powerful interface - the main advantage of AI, multitasking, is greatly reduced when the interface gives players many of the same powers. This is AI play is impressive, if you dont perceive that then you're not grasping the subject matter.
|
4 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
5 |
What
makes
Zero
K
even
harder
to
beat
using
AI
is
that
players
have
such
a
powerful
interface
-
the
main
advantage
of
AI,
multitasking,
is
greatly
reduced
when
the
interface
gives
players
many
of
the
same
powers.
This
is
AI
play
is
impressive,
if
you
dont
perceive
that
then
you
don't
grasp
the
subject
matter.
|
9 |
If
you
just
mean
from
a
players
perspective
its
boring
because
it
can't
beat
you
-
well
of
course,
but
then
besides
deterministic
games
like
Chess
there
aren't
really
publically
avaliable
non-cheating
AIs
that
beat
humans
at
complex
games.
|