| 1 |
I chose that as a really obvious example, but your skirmishers will just move around doing stupid shit, getting out of position, and getting themselves killed all the time - [b]and you'll need much more APM to keep them in line[/b]. If you've positioned your skirmishers somewhere that they can't be baited, they're in a position where they're never going to be in combat.
|
1 |
I chose that as a really obvious example, but your skirmishers will just move around doing stupid shit, getting out of position, and getting themselves killed all the time - [b]and you'll need much more APM to keep them in line[/b]. If you've positioned your skirmishers somewhere that they can't be baited, they're in a position where they're never going to be in combat.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I promise that if I'm playing against somebody and I know their skirmishers aren't on hold position I'm going to abuse the hell out of that.
|
3 |
I promise that if I'm playing against somebody and I know their skirmishers aren't on hold position I'm going to abuse the hell out of that.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Don't get me wrong, I've lost Rockos to failing to fight-order them in the past, and it was annoying... but I'm aware how many more I'd lose to them running out of position whenever I failed to maintain constant vigilance.
|
5 |
Don't get me wrong, I've lost Rockos to failing to fight-order them in the past, and it was annoying... but I'm aware how many more I'd lose to them running out of position whenever I failed to maintain constant vigilance.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
|
|
| 7 |
[quote]Nobody has yet advanced a reason why the above does not end this discussion.[/quote]
|
|
|
Poll: Skirmisher Move State