Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Future of weblobby

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
3/3/2017 9:54:04 AMPLrankFailer before revert after revert
3/3/2017 9:53:54 AMPLrankFailer before revert after revert
Before After
1 I liked the SWL over ZKL except a few things. One of them, which made me go back to ZKL was, that on weaker computers (minę isnt quite a NASA computer) Swl failed to keep up with chat !Y !N spam. Chat lines appeared at rate of one line every ~0.5 second. Adding this to the fact that each !N created 3 lines, and we have a pretty big delay. 1 I liked the SWL over ZKL except a few things. One of them, which made me go back to ZKL was, that on weaker computers (minę isnt quite a NASA computer) Swl failed to keep up with chat !Y !N spam. Chat lines appeared at rate of one line every ~0.5 second. Adding this to the fact that each !N created 3 lines, and we have a pretty big delay.
2 \n 2 \n
3 Doesnt sound very bothering, but in 10v10 game it took the swl a coupled of minutes to realize sth Has changed. And if a quick !Map and !Start happened, my lobby started initializing the startup of ZK after the game (the actual match) Has started. 3 Doesnt sound very bothering, but in 10v10 game it took the swl a coupled of minutes to realize sth Has changed. And if a quick !Map and !Start happened, my lobby started initializing the startup of ZK after the game (the actual match) Has started.
4 Resulting in the !Kick Failer polls. 4 Resulting in the !Kick Failer polls.
5 \n 5 \n
6 On ZKL it never was the case 6 In ZKL it never was the case