| 1 |
Deciphering is probably a bit harder...
|
1 |
Deciphering is probably a bit harder...
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Also, if your goal is to have a cipher that looks like keyboard mashing (i.e. consecutive encrypted letters are close on the keyboard), aren't you doing it the wrong way around? Your cipher transforms actual keyboard mash into "likely" English letters, not likely English letters into keyboard mash.
|
3 |
Also, if your goal is to have a cipher that looks like keyboard mashing (i.e. consecutive encrypted letters are close on the keyboard), aren't you doing it the wrong way around? Your cipher transforms actual keyboard mash into "likely" English letters, not likely English letters into keyboard mash.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
It should be possible to design a (also easily reversable) cipher that does that because [url=https://what-if.xkcd.com/34/]typical written English is around 1.0-1.2 bits per letter[/url], which even the highly redundant nature of a qweqrtasdga string should be able to encode.
|
5 |
It should be possible to design a (also easily reversable) cipher that does that because [url=https://what-if.xkcd.com/34/]typical written English is around 1.0-1.2 bits per letter[/url], which even the highly redundant nature of a qweqrtasdga string should be able to encode.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
(
PS:
https://xkcd.
com/1530/)
|
7 |
(
PS:
https://xkcd.
com/1530/
)
|
Marvin encryption scheme