Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

B483566 2 on Lonely Oasis v1.1 (Multiplayer)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
1/19/2018 11:07:12 AMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
1/19/2018 11:03:01 AMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
1/19/2018 11:02:53 AMCHrankAdminDeinFreund before revert after revert
Before After
1 In @B483545 I didn't go for a scout because it would have severely weakened my strategy, which was supposed to be a surprise raider attack from behind, using the mountains to cover my approach. You countered that with your warrior rush. Both of these are common strategies, yet they decide the game before one sees the other. 1 In @B483545 I didn't go for a scout because it would have severely weakened my strategy, which was supposed to be a surprise raider attack from behind, using the mountains to cover my approach. You countered that with your warrior rush. Both of these are common strategies, yet they decide the game before one sees the other.
2 \n 2 \n
3 If I am to scout, I would have a hard time defending against the raider rush strategy due to it being invisible to scouts. If I don't scout you might have any build that counters mine. Whatever I decide, it will have a major impact on the game that follows by being a purely blind decision. 3 If I am to scout, I would have a hard time defending against the raider rush strategy due to it being invisible to scouts. If I don't scout you might have any build that counters mine. Whatever I decide, it will have a major impact on the game that follows by being a purely blind decision.
4 \n 4 \n
5 In @B483543 you lost the game because you blindly chose the "rush raiders" strategy vs my "rush llt and eco" strategy. I might not have classified the game correctly, but this doesn't change the fact that this was yet another case of blind RPS. 5 In @B483543 you lost the game because you blindly chose the "rush raiders" strategy vs my "rush llt and eco" strategy. I might not have classified the game correctly, but this doesn't change the fact that this was yet another case of blind RPS.
6 \n
7 \n
8 [quote]The most straighforward ways to do this also lead to more expensive cheese availability. Which means more games decided early.[/quote]
9 Adding double com leads to:
10 * More metal that can be used to rush things
11 * Halves relative cost of llt
12 * Halves relative cost of radar
13 * Halves relative cost of scouts
14 \n
15 \n