| 1 |
Do you read what we write?
|
1 |
Do you read what we write?
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
So, here we go again, quoting myself: [quote]Many people like rankings, and some idea to assess "how far" are you. For me colors are "too generic" (but please don't come with the idea to remove those as well :-p, they are good in game to know what you can except). The percentile and the ranking considering only active players was perfect considering what can be available. And the fact that it can jump it is only normal as rankings change always... [/quote]
|
3 |
So, here we go again, quoting myself: [quote]Many people like rankings, and some idea to assess "how far" are you. For me colors are "too generic" (but please don't come with the idea to remove those as well :-p, they are good in game to know what you can except). The percentile and the ranking considering only active players was perfect considering what can be available. And the fact that it can jump it is only normal as rankings change always... [/quote]
|
| 4 |
Also: [quote] I feel there is a discrimination between first 50 players and the rest (not being able to know how good they are except an icon color).If you really believe that numeric ranks are not very informative, then remove the ladders as well.[/quote]
|
4 |
Also: [quote] I feel there is a discrimination between first 50 players and the rest (not being able to know how good they are except an icon color).If you really believe that numeric ranks are not very informative, then remove the ladders as well.[/quote]
|
| 5 |
And:[quote] And in the end what is the "official objective" regarding showing ranking/ladders? It is frustrating to get these back and forth changes without understanding the reason behind (and lets keep separate the underlying algorithm and information used for balancing, I think in that area the objective is "make the most balanced games") [/quote]
|
5 |
And:[quote] And in the end what is the "official objective" regarding showing ranking/ladders? It is frustrating to get these back and forth changes without understanding the reason behind (and lets keep separate the underlying algorithm and information used for balancing, I think in that area the objective is "make the most balanced games") [/quote]
|
| 6 |
Reference: http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/24740
|
6 |
Reference: http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/24740
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
So,
not
sure
why
you
comment
on
which
system
to
use
(
you
say
"why
not
revert
to
elo?")
when
everybody
complains
of
not
showing
a
number/percentile,
while
I
feel
most
people
get
it
will
change/wobble,
get
it
is
not
perfectly
informative,
get
it
can
be
used
internally
in
whatever
way
is
needed.
|
8 |
So,
not
sure
why
you
comment
on
which
system
to
use
(
you
say
"why
not
revert
to
elo?")
when
many
people
complain
of
not
showing
a
number/percentile,
while
I
feel
most
people
get
it
will
change/wobble,
get
it
is
not
perfectly
informative,
get
it
can
be
used
internally
in
whatever
way
is
needed.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
And I find it quite hypocritical to show the number in the ladder, but not in the user profile...
|
10 |
And I find it quite hypocritical to show the number in the ladder, but not in the user profile...
|
elo on big big user page