Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

elo on big big user page

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
2/9/2018 9:48:27 AMFRrankmalric before revert after revert
Before After
1 Can we please focus on an issue at the time? This thread (and at least another one) is about showing (respectively not showing) number(s) on the user page, while they are shown in the ladder/top 50 - which is something inconsistent. 1 Can we please focus on an issue at the time? This thread (and at least another one) is about showing (respectively not showing) number(s) on the user page, while they are shown in the ladder/top 50 - which is something inconsistent.
2 \n 2 \n
3 I could have seen an argument for hiding all the numbers: to avoid people commenting about how it should be computed, people should see just the final ranking (ex: Godde's thread and the fashion of creating "CasualX"). 3 I could have seen an argument for hiding all the numbers: to avoid people commenting about how it should be computed, people should see just the final ranking (ex: Godde's thread and the fashion of creating "CasualX").
4 \n 4 \n
5 The strange thing is that now we have a situation that annoys a lot of people and seems bad for the game (people not in top 50 because it is not obvious for them how they compare with top50, top50 players because when they play 1v1 they see the rating changed in the other ones which makes them create smurf, developers because people complain and they feel not appreciated). 5 The strange thing is that now we have a situation that annoys a lot of people and seems bad for the game (people not in top 50 because it is not obvious for them how they compare with top50, top50 players because when they play 1v1 they see the rating changed in the other ones which makes them create smurf, developers because people complain and they feel not appreciated).
6 \n 6 \n
7 An example answer to the questions about the number missing could have been: if you do mouse hover over the bar of the rank there will be a "progress", which is the new "number" you can check. But what exactly are those ranks and progress is again not explained at all ( tried to look in the wiki for them, I could look in the code but. . . ) . 7 An example answer to the questions about the number missing could have been: if you do mouse hover over the bar of the rank there will be a "progress", which is the new "number" you can check. But what exactly are those ranks and progress is again not explained at all ( tried to look in the wiki for them, I could look in the code but. . . ) . Edit: for reference, I liked best the percentile number, and guess that "transformed" to the progress, but seems people prefer to be offended rather than give a simple explanation and we need to discover/imagine things. . .
8 \n 8 \n
9 \n 9 \n