1 |
It's good that something is done to try and gently push the community to play smaller team games, because:
|
1 |
It's good that something is done to try and gently push the community to play smaller team games, because:
|
2 |
- games more likely to be available at all times of day
|
2 |
- games more likely to be available at all times of day
|
3 |
- less performance issues
|
3 |
- less performance issues
|
4 |
- more games running simultaneously, lower waiting times
|
4 |
- more games running simultaneously, lower waiting times
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
Currently
teams
MM
are
share
the
same
"competitive"
status
and
rank
as
1v1
MM.
Maybe
more
people
would
randomly
join
in
if
it
were
casual
instead?
I
would.
|
7 |
Currently
teams
MM
share
the
same
"competitive"
status
and
rank
as
1v1
MM.
Maybe
more
people
would
randomly
join
in
if
it
were
casual
instead?
I
would.
|
8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
9 |
Another aspect of this is the lack of incentive to hold ladder positions. There could be awards for holding a top-X position on the competitive ladder at the end of each month, and for N consecutive months.
|
9 |
Another aspect of this is the lack of incentive to hold ladder positions. There could be awards for holding a top-X position on the competitive ladder at the end of each month, and for N consecutive months.
|