Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Quickplay Autohost Matchmaker

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
10/23/2018 4:24:39 AMPTrankraaar before revert after revert
Before After
1 It's good that something is done to try and gently push the community to play smaller team games, because: 1 It's good that something is done to try and gently push the community to play smaller team games, because:
2 - games more likely to be available at all times of day 2 - games more likely to be available at all times of day
3 - less performance issues 3 - less performance issues
4 - more games running simultaneously, lower waiting times 4 - more games running simultaneously, lower waiting times
5 \n 5 \n
6 \n 6 \n
7 Currently teams MM are share the same "competitive" status and rank as 1v1 MM. Maybe more people would randomly join in if it were casual instead? I would. 7 Currently teams MM share the same "competitive" status and rank as 1v1 MM. Maybe more people would randomly join in if it were casual instead? I would.
8 \n 8 \n
9 Another aspect of this is the lack of incentive to hold ladder positions. There could be awards for holding a top-X position on the competitive ladder at the end of each month, and for N consecutive months. 9 Another aspect of this is the lack of incentive to hold ladder positions. There could be awards for holding a top-X position on the competitive ladder at the end of each month, and for N consecutive months.