Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Pointy end of ranks

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
8/13/2019 8:41:38 AMFRrankmalric before revert after revert
Before After
1 The problem might be that a side effect of increasing threshold for variance was that now people that did not play in a long time (ex check Blackdutchie, position 6 in ladder, did not play in 2 months) are included in ranks computations. Previously not playing a long time would increase your variance hence you would be eliminated from rank bands. Now with the widened variance a lot of players that did not play in a long time are included. 1 The problem might be that a side effect of increasing threshold for variance was that now people that did not play in a long time (ex check Blackdutchie, position 6 in ladder, did not play in 2 months) are included in ranks computations. Previously not playing a long time would increase your variance hence you would be eliminated from rank bands. Now with the widened variance a lot of players that did not play in a long time are included.
2 \n 2 \n
3 I think that ideal is to have both faster inclusion in ranking (current wider band) and elimination from visible ranks computations of inactive players (lets say 1 month). 3 I think that ideal is to have both faster inclusion in ranking (current wider band) and elimination from visible ranks computations of inactive players (lets say 1 month).
4 \n 4 \n
5 5 Edit: out of top20, 6 of the players did not login in more than a month. And at least one logged in but did not play.