Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Should there be a direct counter super weapons ?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
11/13/2019 1:36:10 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
11/13/2019 1:35:54 PMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
Before After
1 I find it interesting if there are conditions under which superweapons fail to win: 1 I find it interesting if there are conditions under which superweapons fail to win:
2 \n 2 \n
3 - Fail to provide enough AA and get bombed 3 - Fail to provide enough AA and get bombed
4 - Fail to control territory in tac range of your super [i]or[/i] to have a bunch of Funnelwebs guarding it -> get tacnuked 4 - Fail to control territory in tac range of your super [i]or[/i] to have a bunch of Funnelwebs guarding it -> get tacnuked
5 - Fail to provide a flea screen -> get ulti'd 5 - Fail to provide a flea screen -> get ulti'd
6 - Fail to have enough antis -> get nuked
6 \n 7 \n
7 I don't think there needs to be anything on which you can [u]rely[/u] to beat a superweapon though. 8 I don't think there needs to be anything on which you can [u]rely[/u] to beat a superweapon though.