1 |
Games will have to be balanced regardless of whether MM is the sole definer of rank, so in effect this means that casual elo becomes invisible.
|
1 |
Games will have to be balanced regardless of whether MM is the sole definer of rank, so in effect this means that casual elo becomes invisible.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
[quote]In my personal opinion, I don't consider FFA with 1 player per "team" relevant to team games balance[/quote]
|
3 |
[quote]In my personal opinion, I don't consider FFA with 1 player per "team" relevant to team games balance[/quote]
|
4 |
As
a
matter
of
personal
opinion,
i
disagree.
The
ladders
don't
precisely
mirror
each
other,
but
they
correlate
pretty
strongly,
and
most
of
the
cases
where
a
person
has
a
significantly
different
position
between
ladders,
this
is
because
they
have
no
played
enough
games
in
one
of
the
categories
to
converge
to
a
number
that
would
reflect
their
skill
accurately.
|
4 |
As
a
matter
of
personal
opinion,
i
disagree.
|
|
|
5 |
\n
|
|
|
6 |
The ladders don't precisely mirror each other, but they correlate pretty strongly.
|
|
|
7 |
\n
|
|
|
8 |
And most of the cases where a person has a significantly different position between ladders, this is because they have no played enough games in one of the categories to converge to a number that would reflect their skill accurately.
|
|
|
9 |
\n
|
|
|
10 |
That is, the difference is to a large extent (but of course not totally) caused not by their different skill in the respective game mode, but by the amount of games they actually play of that mode.
|