Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Detriment model

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/6/2012 2:41:56 PMUSrankCrazyEddie before revert after revert
Before After
1 "we'll make it do something cool and impressive" 1 "we'll make it do something cool and impressive"
2 \n 2 \n
3 Undoubtedly. But it should be more than just cool and impressive. The fact that the gun is being deployed should be *significant*, i.e. it should signify something. 3 Undoubtedly. But it should be more than just cool and impressive. The fact that the gun is being deployed should be *significant*, i.e. it should signify something.
4 \n 4 \n
5 At the very least, if the shoulder gun is "just a weapon" ( i. e. it could be used any time) then it should have a reload time of at least a minute. But it would be better if the shoulder gun were something that only got deployed when circumstances warranted it, and it stayed out as long as those circumstances remained relevant, and then it got put away. And the relevant circumstances should inherently contain heightened risk, so that deploying the shoulder gun has an element of "Okay, I didn't want to do this, but you leave me now choice. . . time to pull out the BIG guns. " 5 At the very least, if the shoulder gun is "just a weapon" ( i. e. it could be used any time) then it should have a reload time of at least a minute. But it would be better if the shoulder gun were something that only got deployed when circumstances warranted it, and it stayed out as long as those circumstances remained relevant, and then it got put away. And the relevant circumstances should inherently contain heightened risk, so that deploying the shoulder gun has an element of "Okay, I didn't want to do this, but you leave me no choice. . . time to pull out the BIG guns. "
6 \n 6 \n