Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

B863603 19 on Tabula-v6.1 (Multiplayer)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/10/2020 9:02:25 AMLVrankSenaven before revert after revert
4/10/2020 9:01:01 AMLVrankSenaven before revert after revert
4/10/2020 9:00:23 AMLVrankSenaven before revert after revert
Before After
1 So @Archangel got ban for opening kick vote against @darian? And @shrimpy gladly reported her? Did he report also all other 'y' voters because it was majority decision? As like @rusbolshakov kick. 1 So @Archangel got ban for opening kick vote against @darian? And @shrimpy gladly reported her? Did he report also all other 'y' voters because it was majority decision? As like @rusbolshakov kick.
2 From my opinion @darian deserved kick. He was totally useless and didn't do anything usefull. However i dont know if thet was because he was total newbie or what. The point still is that majority voted 'y'. And as @Archangel didn't spam kick votes all around then i don't understand this ban. 2 From my opinion @darian deserved kick. He was totally useless and didn't do anything usefull. However i dont know if thet was because he was total newbie or what. The point still is that majority voted 'y'. And as @Archangel didn't spam kick votes all around then i don't understand this ban.
3 @Sigero carry this game. Tanks most game stand watching and doing nothing and then go in one big glorious kamikaze run. 3 @Sigero carry this game. Tanks most game stand watching and doing nothing and then go in one big glorious kamikaze run.
4 Strange thing was dat @Cladode was trageted with kick vote but he was spectataor and dont even comment in all chat. 4 Strange thing was dat @Cladode was trageted with kick vote but he was spectataor and dont even comment in all chat.
5 This case is not pluk case in every aspect. I don't see ant individual CoC breaking because it was majority decision and not kick spamming around. 5 This case is not pluk case in every aspect. I don't see ant individual CoC breaking because it was majority decision and not kick spamming around. even when i see that @Archangel didn't inform newbie enough good. IMHO no more then warning should be issued at this situation.
6 *I watched game unit end. 6 *I watched game unit end.