| 1 |
[q]not as hard, much less, and also he would have built something useful
|
1 |
[q]not as hard, much less, and also he would have built something useful
|
| 2 |
not just destroyed teammates eco by just wasting into storage[/q]
|
2 |
not just destroyed teammates eco by just wasting into storage[/q]
|
| 3 |
I feel like we're not being sufficiently precise in the setup. Write out an explicit situation or make an example replay. There are probably some hidden assumptions that need to be dug up.
|
3 |
I feel like we're not being sufficiently precise in the setup. Write out an explicit situation or make an example replay. There are probably some hidden assumptions that need to be dug up.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Here is my claim:
|
5 |
Here is my claim:
|
| 6 |
* Player A has no energy structures of their own and Player B has some energy structures.
|
6 |
* Player A has no energy structures of their own and Player B has some energy structures.
|
| 7 |
*
Anything
you
do
to
reduce
the
energy
available
to
Player
A
via
Player
B
constructing
storage
can
instead
be
done
more
effectively
by
Player
B
constructing
and
running
area
cloakers.
|
7 |
*
If
Player
A
wants
to
reduce
the
energy
income
of
Player
B,
then
constructing
and
running
area
cloakers
is
at
least
as
effective
as
constructing
storages.
|
storages can throw team games.