| 1 |
I've checked the replay and done some tests.
|
1 |
I've checked the replay and done some tests.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
It's the down-beam that causes the deformation (e.g. glint-to-target beam).
|
3 |
It's the down-beam that causes the deformation (e.g. glint-to-target beam).
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
It *does* collide with the building, however that doesn't prevent deformation.
|
5 |
It *does* collide with the building, however that doesn't prevent deformation.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
The reason could be that Craterpuncher's aoe is 140, while Starlight's colvol is a box sized 100x120x100. But changing the height of this box to 150 fails to prevent the Starlight from being moved as the beam craters the surroundings.
|
7 |
The reason could be that Craterpuncher's aoe is 140, while Starlight's colvol is a box sized 100x120x100. But changing the height of this box to 150 fails to prevent the Starlight from being moved as the beam craters the surroundings.
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
A beam shooting directly next to a Starlight - where its collision volume should have no business blocking anything, but close enough - causes it to consistently slide down. So i think in general relying on colvol blocking is not going to work.
|
B885094 5 on Violence_4.2 (Multiplayer)